Gashimov Memorial, Round 2 is LIVE and Open to ALL MEMBERS!Click here to watch!
Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

5/4/2012 - Mate in 5


  • 24 months ago · Quote · #121

    ionutg

    nice problem! Wink

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #122

    fprovidence

    WOW...

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #123

    navneethc

    Sacrifice a potential queen and a rook! And then this!!

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #124

    PauIKing

    haha what

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #125

    saksipotku

    I had seen this before, but it's still as beautiful.

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #126

    I_REMAIN_SILENT

    impressive .... i like it!

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #127

    ashmo

    too easyCool

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #128

    kyletracey

    nice looking final board id say.

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #129

    milray101

    uber nice knights

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #130

    szammie

    Nice.

    SZ.

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #131

    ricker23

    Nice table setting.

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #132

    HoboGambit

    Yeh this is a great mate, the fact that in order to defend himself from a mate he must capture the rook with his knight on f7 only to realize that knight on f7 would ultimately block his king from avoiding the mate with the twin white knights.

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #133

    stecopps

    yeah

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #134

    deepak64

    Great puzzle.

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #135

    relatedsqrs

    very nice double knight mate

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #136

    doublebruce

    14  Hours  ;  Alice I am going to send you to the moon.

    Please be relevant, helpful & nice!

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #137

    MDCCP

    Cool :) !

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #138

    noe12

    strange

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #139

    pro-life77

    very cool, nice pattern.

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #140

    ghamilto61

    Kind of easy when the rooks make it clear you have to put them in check every time, but clever two knight mate.


Back to Top

Post your reply: