Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

8/20/2011 - Long Distance


  • 21 months ago · Quote · #141

    happysmile023

    what about qd4 first and then rxd4 bxb7 winning the rook?

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #142

    mredus

    JulioTayoyo wrote:

    Mate in 2

    Evrybody try this mate in 2...answer will come out soon...

     


    1....Bf6 2....Qh4

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #143

    Jacob30

    hard puzzle I think

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #144

    Bryan681972

    mredus wrote:
    JulioTayoyo wrote:

    Mate in 2

    Evrybody try this mate in 2...answer will come out soon...

     


    1....Bf6 2....Qh4

    If 1. Bf6 then where's the mate on 1...Rh8?


  • 21 months ago · Quote · #145

    Jacob30

    hard night

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #146

    Bryan681972

    I originally thought 4. Bd2 was correct as it looks natural because it defends the rook on c1, but then after finding the correct answer I figured out why 4. Be1 is the only correct move.  If 4. Bd2 Qd7!  Then if 5. Bxc6 Qxd2 and black immediately recovers his piece.  If 5. Rxc6 Rd8 which double attacks the bishop on d5 and sets up a skewer on the bishop on d2.  The rook cannot defend d5 due to black's bishop on f8.  If 6. e4 then 6...fe.  It looks like white's best might be 6. Bxf7+ Qxf7, recovering his pawn and leaving material equal.

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #147

    Jacob30

    I'm up it's 2:11 AM

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #148

    Bryan681972

    Remember white is a rook down, plus a pawn, in the original position so simply recovering the rook with a bishop pair advantage is not best.

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #149

    Jacob30

    I'm alright to go

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #150

    Bryan681972

    YiYangHuang2 wrote:

    Also a Qh1

    Nice puzzle!


  • 21 months ago · Quote · #151

    Bryan681972

    martyep wrote:

    When I examine something like this, I never assume a blatant mistake such as the opposing player leaving the rook out there for the taking. It was not a worthy "sacrifice". Why would I plan on such a bad move as the opposing knight move (Nc6) when the black rook is screaming "get me outta here!"? I must be missing something because others seem to be impressed. Hmmmmm!

    If the rook moves instead of 2...Nc6 then 3. Bxb7 wins the queen immediately, unless 2...Rd1+.  Then 3. Rxd1 wins the first rook followed by at least the other rook on the next move.  If 3...Nc6 4. Bxc6 would win at least both rooks and the knight.


  • 21 months ago · Quote · #152

    Bryan681972

    slowhare wrote:

    Go for the win.

     

    If 1. Bxd5 Qxd5 2. Qxe7 Nd7 avoids getting checkmated.


  • 21 months ago · Quote · #153

    JulioTayoyo

    Mate in 2

     

    Everybody try...answer soon..

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #154

    Jacob30

    JulioTayoyo wrote:

    Mate in 2

     

    Everybody try...answer soon..


     I have realized what you are thinking and it will never happen for me.

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #155

    Bryan681972

    JulioTayoyo wrote:

    Mate in 2

     

    Everybody try...answer soon..

    What happened?  The position changed!


  • 21 months ago · Quote · #156

    mredus

    Bryan681972 wrote:
    mredus wrote:
    JulioTayoyo wrote:

    Mate in 2

    Evrybody try this mate in 2...answer will come out soon...

     


    1....Bf6 2....Qh4

    If 1. Bf6 then where's the mate on 1...Rh8?



    ummm... oops? lol thanks for pointing that out!

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #157

    mredus

    mredus wrote:
    Bryan681972 wrote:
    mredus wrote:
    JulioTayoyo wrote:

    Mate in 2

    Evrybody try this mate in 2...answer will come out soon...

     


    1....Bf6 2....Qh4

    If 1. Bf6 then where's the mate on 1...Rh8?



    ummm... oops? lol thanks for pointing that out!


    HAHA I just saw the revision, there was supposed to be a knight on h8 so that 1. ...Rh8 wouldnt be possible, it seems there would be no mate in 2 on with the original position, but that is probably still the line I would take lol

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #158

    Bryan681972

    mredus wrote:
    mredus wrote:
    Bryan681972 wrote:
    mredus wrote:
    JulioTayoyo wrote:

    Mate in 2

    Evrybody try this mate in 2...answer will come out soon...

     


    1....Bf6 2....Qh4

    If 1. Bf6 then where's the mate on 1...Rh8?



    ummm... oops? lol thanks for pointing that out!


    HAHA I just saw the revision, there was supposed to be a knight on h8 so that 1. ...Rh8 wouldnt be possible, it seems there would be no mate in 2 on with the original position, but that is probably still the line I would take lol

    In the revision I think 1. Bf6 can be met by 1...Ng6, holding the critical h4 and f4 squares.  Unless I am missing something, I don't see any mate in two with any first move.  Please correct me if i'm wrong.  Maybe it needs to be revised another time!


  • 21 months ago · Quote · #159

    Ocky

    ?

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #160

    Jacob30

    Hard and solvable.


Back to Top

Post your reply: