10354 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Ha, brilliant! I didn't even consider castling. No complaints, on the contrary, it wakens up the mind to consider more.
Extraordinarily unrealistic way of getting this right. Overall, a good one.
it would have been helpful to know i could still castle...
Yea, this is the most TROLL PUZZLE EVER XD
To Girts30, its a puzzle to exercise your "chess eye" to see the relationship of files diagonals and critical squares. This is a useful exercise because this is what you use to think ahead when creating a tactic in a real game. The fact that it was a 0-0 move in an end game tells you not to take anything for granted (in a puzzle or a real game).
Sorry mr. Einstein but this happens just inside your head. I doubt in the whole chess history that this position will ever be reached without a castle. And to castle with mate, pfew.
Anyway, I like this puzzle because it beaten me.
Well since I already posted 3 games in this topic (post #253) where there was a very late castling it is already documented that it can happen in real games. In two of those games the castling happened in move 48 (without a check mate), in the third game the castling happened in move 31 giving a check mate.
Want more documentation? Look here:
Paul Morphy vs Alonzo Morphy 1850, (without Queen's rook) ending with 18. 0-0# :http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1238144
Edward Lasker vs George Alan Thomas, 1912,the game could have ended with either18. Kd2# or with 18. 0-0-0#Lasker chose to play 18. Kd2#http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1259009
Lodewijk Prins vs Lawrence Day, 1968, ended with 31... 0-0-0#http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1037399&kpage=1
how on earth am i supposed to know that white didnt castle ???????
WHY DIDN'T YOU TELL ME I HAD THE RIGHT TO CASTLE?! AND HOW IS THIS FRIKIN POSITION EVEN POSSIBLE?!
How can I create my own .abk opening book?
by Remi1771 a few minutes ago
custom Made Chessboard
by loubalch 3 minutes ago
How long will this tournament take
by Remi1771 3 minutes ago
by shreyas_agrawal 6 minutes ago
5/24/2015 - Too Many Threats, Not Enough Solutions
by metacam 13 minutes ago
i feel bad for both UK and America chess
by MindControl116 15 minutes ago
5/22/2015 - Surya Ganguly - Emanuel Berg , Gibraltar, 2009
by rudrani 15 minutes ago
Catorization of errors in computer analysis
by Martin_Stahl 16 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer or Magnus Carlsen
by alec295 17 minutes ago
USCF Online Rated Tournaments
by Warbringer33 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!