9219 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
hork
TwoMove
Hello,
I would say impossible, unless the weaker side helps. QvR can be hard work to win, so a powerful force like two bishops no chance, unless there is a tactic to win one of the bishops immediately.
Also RvB is a draw, although quite a painful one. Whilst the R and goodness knows how many pawns v two bishops should have been winning for white.
Bye John S
I gave you my honest opionion, based on what I would be thinking during the game.
Unfortunately only FIDE 2012, so make mistakes. Checking up on wikipedia found
this
hahah very interesting, so only 71 moves huh? drawing fortress describes it well. thanks again man.
Hork
Azoth
ill just comment when the 2 bishops vs queen esenario arrives, in this especific case i think theres no need for tablebases the week kings its near the edge and the further more the both bishops are far from the kings protection.
Here whites plan shold be atack with the queen one bishop and at the same time getting a position where on the next movethe queen can atack the king and/or the other bishop.
The move that was made on your game forgot one of the basic chess principles central control.
Yes, thanks Azoth. I thought the final position was what meant by the fortress, but didn't check moves to reach it.
That means black should have given up bishop for pawn, to reach RvB at some point. Not sure of the most accurate way to do this. High rated players have lost this endgame, so would not have been a phleasant task to defend.
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by AnthonyCG 2 minutes ago
Live Game with Commentating!
by ChristianSoldier007 3 minutes ago
3/31/2012 - Bill Melvin v Robert Cunningham
by 06-jwagg 3 minutes ago
Database?
by iused 5 minutes ago
Super inexpensive coaching
by VladBGhita 6 minutes ago
Wht Bobby Fischer would have beaten Kasparov.
by echecs06 9 minutes ago
HoS Zukertort and Marshall review
by NajdorfDefense 10 minutes ago
5/25/2012 - Reshevsky-Ivanovic, Skopje 1976
by boulderlaw 16 minutes ago
Vote chess improvements
by Bubatz 17 minutes ago
The deadly opening traps
by Angelfirefly 19 minutes ago