Here is an interesting game that I finished just recently. :) This was a closed game that went into a tough endgame. :)
Einstein, the one ?! move I see is the Queen capture. You had his dark squared bishop as a bad bishop due to his pawn stuck on the dark square in the middle. You trading it off allowed his pawn to recover which caused his dark square bishop to have a superior position.
That's also why I love 16...Bxe5 His knight moved to a strong position so you took it out and made his dark squared bishop bad. Giving a somewhat locked position meaning your 2 knights and bishop sould be stronger than his 2 bishops and knight. And that ended up being the case in the end game.
I think he moved his knight prematurely.
Good game :)
Interesting game! 54.Rd3! was an absolute game saver.
You thought his 20.Qd6 is good but I think 20.Qe2 (attacking your a-pawn and threatening an attack which blows big holes in your castled position) was very strong. In fact I think it "refutes" your 0-0-0.
Why were you so worried about him moving his bishop to g7? It doesn't attack anything or fulfill any function there. I think that would have been a pointless move.
Also, why didn't you play 32... gxh3 e.p.? After 33. Bxh5 Rh6 I think you have a good attack against his king and a passed pawn.
Darthstapler8
Actually I wasn't too worried about his bishop moving to g7. :) There was some discussion about exd6 where his bishop gets more room. :) I agree that his bishop was not able to attack much when most of my pieces are on light squares.
And 32...gxh3 e.p. would not have been a bad move. Instead of playing 33 Bxh5 he can play 33 Kh2 and that would stop my attack. :) I was focusing on his passed pawn because I think I had enough material to win it but he decided to do the rook sac. :)
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
But how much do you know about the game - the history, the players, the rules, and more!? Take our quiz and compare your scores!
Mark all forum topics as READ