10233 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Here are some questions about the king and rook versus king game. The example I've seen of the King and Rook vs. King, it looks like the lone king plays along with it, making it easier.
It says neither side wants to opposition. So I thought, isn't the opposition good when the lone king actually goes after the rook? Then if they do break off pursuing the rook, the rook can move to lose tempo and lose the opposition. What I mean is that it doesn't look like it really matters for the side with the rook because they can drop it. Am I correct in this?
Another possibility I thought of was where the king is already in the way of the rook.
If anyone can think of another scenario, please let me know.
Oh, I thought this was going to be about Kramnik vs Kasparov or something like that.
And in the first diagram White should play 1 Kd5. It will be much faster (1... Ke7 2 Rf2 or 1... Kc7 2 Rb2).
And this should have been in the second one as another example of why I don't see how the opposition is bad for the side with the rook. I understand that it might result in a couple of turns extra, but does that really matter in this situation?
I'm sorry, I read your notation wrong. You're right! I wonder if the author saw that or if they just wanted to show the basic concept of blocking a rank from the king.
Oops, my 14 move with Kd5 was actually mate in 4.
I really wish this site would delete the comments completely instead of saying "[COMMENT DELETED]"
The king and rook are always suppose to work in tandem to cut down the possiblity of squares to save time in blitz. I used to lose all the time trying to mate this basic mate and was using the whole board as shown.
Don't swing the rook across the whole board. Cut the king off early and save squares grandually narrowing the defenders squares.
According to the Nalimov tablebase, 1 Kd5 mates in 9. 1 Ra6 mates in 10. Look it up here:
your correct opposition on first move
Solid black openings for a beginner ?
by AnnieDazy a few minutes ago
by Schevenadorf 4 minutes ago
5/21/2013 - The Power of Imagination
by Intrepidberk 4 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by chasm1995 5 minutes ago
how is this game
by chessfansupporter 5 minutes ago
Very Early Queen exchange
by Estragon 7 minutes ago
Is blitz really bad if u want to improve
by LongIslandMark 7 minutes ago
Scotch Opening w/ Knight Exchange
by Expertise87 11 minutes ago
Staunton Chess Set - Wellington
by Lucidish_Lux 13 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by Oran_perrett 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com