12471 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I sacked a N for the great initiative but ended up with just three pawns for it. 8-5 with one of mine doubled: 3-2, 5(4)-3.
Is there a rule of thumb, swap off the pieces? Or keep them on the board? Or .... ?
No, he is not playing any chess.com games, nor has he. It could be on another site, though.
It do feel kinda strange to have "rule of thumb" interpreted as help in a game in progress.
Is this a game you are currently playing? You can't ask for advice on a game in progress.
What if someone is playing 100 games and wants to learn about rook endings, or his favorite opening, or basic tactics? In my opinion it's okay to ask for general advice, but nothing specific to an ongoing game.
Thanks to all! "Even" joey, whose handle I especially appreciate.
I hadn't played in decades and in the only game I've played with such a situatuation since starting up, I had to do my poor best to trade off the minors, whatever the rule of thumb might be. His Knights and Rooks virtually helpless because of my pawn chains, and I because of the two accursed Bishops, my pieces being cramped and/or pinned to defense.
By the way, I've recevied just two notifications total on two threads.
Without precise position, it's hard to say... Are the number in post number one indicating a position ? If so, you had better post a diagram.
As for a rule of thumb, I would say the further the pawns are from each other, the better. And rook pawns are a plague to knights. But it all depends on the position.
Thanks. You speak of tempi? Oh no. Knights!
i think knights will lose
and pawns will win
Draw in this line at least.
In post # 14 (and the corresponding line of #15), 6...Kxc4?? is just stupid and greedy. 6...Kb6 ! and the pawns are stopped (the threat is Nxa6 bxa6 Kxa6 and then that's a drawn K vs. K+p even if the white king manages to defend the last pawn).
The general rule for imbalanced positions is that if you have pawns versus a piece, your winning chances are increased by exchanging pieces. Of course all general rules have exceptions, but this one is often a good guide.
In a blitz game, you might just get on with exchanging, watching out for danger. In a turn-based game, you might use this idea to guide your analysis.
game i totally misunderstood.
by Inyustisia 4 minutes ago
Need help vs Nimzo!
by NothingIsForSho 6 minutes ago
It's a paradox
by kleelof 10 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by Robert0905 15 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by Rambo2004 20 minutes ago
Free Will vs. Determinism in Chess
by SocialPanda 22 minutes ago
Who is good at the Scandinavian?
by tigerprowl5 23 minutes ago
I am done with chess.com
by kaynight 24 minutes ago
10/20/2014 - Anand - Radjabov, Linares 2009 Analysis
by EulerTheToiler 24 minutes ago
10/9/2014 - Mate in 5
by l1232351 31 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!