Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Rook vs Bishop and Knight

Jump to forum:
 
1st June 2008, 12:10pm
#1
by CatoTheElder
New Orleans United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 138

Was played out to a win (Black missed a drawing opportunity.) But I would like a closer look at this to see if either side (mostly black) had winning chances they missed.



1st June 2008, 10:30pm
#2
by NM OmarCayenne
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 12607
Looks like he could probably have drawn by 12... Kc5 and if 13 a7 Na8 14 Rb8 Kc6.
2nd June 2008, 04:20pm
#3
by CatoTheElder
New Orleans United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 138
tonydal wrote: Looks like he could probably have drawn by 12... Kc5 and if 13 a7 Na8 14 Rb8 Kc6.

 Mmmmmm... Indeed. Missing Kc5 on 10 wasn't fatal. There was still a chance for it later.


2nd June 2008, 04:54pm
#4
by knock
Bs As Argentina
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 4

What if instead of 4... Na4,  4... Bxc3

 

Wouldn't that had been better? 


2nd June 2008, 04:59pm
#5
by Marshal_Dillon
New Jersey United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 465
Collectively bishop and knight can cover more squares than rook alone and black also has the partially passed pawn, control of the center and a better located king so black should have won this game. 
2nd June 2008, 07:04pm
#6
by TulsaDavid
Tulsa, Oklahoma United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 558
Black should have won. However, both white and black made a few errors and missed a few opportunities. But you should have lost the game with 3. Rb7?? as the diagram to the left will demonstrate.

Better would have been 3. Ra3!, which would have resulted in a draw (had you both played without blunders).

Again, the diagram to the left, with obvious variations available but similar in opportunity and position, demonstrates how your move should have resulted in your checkmate.
2nd June 2008, 07:27pm
#7
by CatoTheElder
New Orleans United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 138
knock wrote:

What if instead of 4... Na4,  4... Bxc3. 

 

Wouldn't that had been better? 


 Yeah...


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.