11109 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Which side would you rather be in the three diagrams below?
Diagram 1: white, since he has the pair and can limit the c file.
Diagram 2: black, of course. Even though white has three minor pieces, the queen is far more superior and can quickly pick up pawns and pieces.
Diagram 3: black. 2 rooks is better than the lone queen here.
I agree with you on no. 1, but in no. 2 I think the three pieces work better than the queen, in no. 3 can't White trade the Queen for 2 rooks if they penetrate?
1. White, for the same reasons Chess4001 stated.
2. White, because white's pieces should coordinate against the queen and beat her. White's has no real structural problems so his pawns should be easily defensible.
3. Black, same as Chess4001
#3...pawns on both sides of the board, so queen is generally better.
I played some games from Diagram 3 with White and they really do illustrate and emphasise the ability of the Queen. While the Queen can often trade herself for two invading rooks the rooks can hardly do the same for the Queen; therefore I believe White has an edge in Number 3.
I'd play anyone that disagrees with me with those starting positions.
If I win, I've proven my point, if I lose, I've learned something about chess, so it's a win-win.
I don't think there's a convenient way to do it though. Can you create a challenge with your own starting position?
Principle: (heard this on a chess.com video!) the more pawns in a Q vs. 2R's game, the stronger the queen is! Also, in the starting position (8 pawns each on 2nd/7th rank), with one side having only a queen and the other only two rooks, the queen wins! So I'd say diagram #3 is the advantage is probably for the queen- the position has 7 pawns!
How should we get a game going? Using messages and the analysis board?
Ok, I took a look at number again and decided to change my mind. White has the pair and doesn't have much exploitable weaknesses.
I tend to believe that white should be better in each of these positions. Mostly this is just quick intuitive assesment but to mention few possible reasons each position is relatively closed which should probably favour the type of material white has and white has the advantage of the first move which can be quite telling as black isn't ideally coordinated.
By the way, is there some deeper meaning behind having the white pawn in a3 in the first diagram but in a2 in others?
No, the position of the a-pawn shouldn't make much of a difference.
Need to get stuff figured out
by PamirLeopard87 2 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by power_2_the_people 8 minutes ago
5/29/2015 - Kramnik-Anand WC match 2008
by kandy_chaitu 12 minutes ago
Mate in 6. Masters only! :D
by Warbringer33 14 minutes ago
Please Analyse My Game
by thechessplaya5 17 minutes ago
Moving two pawns in the opening
by jurassicmark 26 minutes ago
why didn't chigorin become world champ
by fabelhaft 31 minutes ago
Need help analyzing a crazy 3|0 game
by 11qq11 32 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Was A Real Champion!
by badger_song 32 minutes ago
The only reason Fischer became world champ
by fabelhaft 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!