9055 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
rednblack
I'm curious as to whether someone can tell me if the position found below is a draw or win for white with correct play. I typically come to endgame positions similar to this when playing the English opening, so any insight would be welcomed and helpful.
xie1995
march the king, and the rook confines the black king to the kingside, lock in the kingside, trade one of your queenside pawns for the bishop and queen the other and you win!
I understand the planning aspect, and thats basically what I did until my opponent blundered. My question is if the position itself is a win for white or a draw if black plays correctly.
rrrttt
it's a n00b vs n00b win
NM OmarCayenne
I don't think it's the sort of thing where you can say there's a 100% certain win; there are too many blockades that can happen and so forth. But certainly White has very good winning chances indeed (they will probably decrease significantly if rooks come off the board). Black is fortunate in that his pawns prevent the other bishop from getting into play (and onto any really good outposts...d5 for example). The two connected passers are of course a huge plus; but it's probably gonna take a while before we can say for sure that White has a won game.
RosarioVampire
Opposite colour bishops? I'd say, off-hand, that it's a draw.
rooperi
I think White should win, but it will be hard work, and the Rooks must stay on the board, as NM tonydal said.
That's really good to know, Tonydal and Rooperi. I did the exact wrong thing in this position. I traded rooks with the plan of advancing my queenside pawns. Black played incorrectly (though he wasn't alone in this) and I got the win.
Are there some good rules or maxims about when one should and should not trade some of the heavier pieces in endgames?
marvellosity
rednblack - opposite coloured bishops have a strong drawing tendency, because they cannot attack the other coloured square, meaning often blockades can be set up. So to increase winning chances, we need other pieces that can attack other squares. Take a look at your position without rooks and with Black to move:
marvellosity, thank you for including the diagram. That's very helpful.
Help us brainstorm new Site Awards ("Badges")
by K279 a few minutes ago
Green vs Charcoal??
Last night's Live Chess changes
by K279 3 minutes ago
Live Game with Commentating!
by ChristianSoldier007 3 minutes ago
What makes a Class A - Expert Player?
by pravx 4 minutes ago
Are We Actually Getting Better At Chess?
by adamplenty 7 minutes ago
FREE videos this week... to complement Study Plans!
by ciljettu 10 minutes ago
HoS Zukertort and Marshall review
by Bronco70 14 minutes ago
Why do I mess up in winning positions?
by Redglove6 17 minutes ago
What the @*#*@? And *I* get dinged for this?
by reflectivist 17 minutes ago