14921 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hi. Not 100% sure this is the right section but...
If my opponent sacs his bishop + knight for my rook + pawn on F7 or F2, what type of endgame should I go for?
Should I look to exchange minor pieces? Major? Or should I look to keep as many pieces on the board as possible?
If this is done early in the game, then I think you want to delay the end game. Rooks display their power in the endgame with open files and ranks. You want to maximize your minor pieces by working to create weaknesses and outposts on the light squares. Keep his two rooks out if play by avoiding pawn exchanges.
The idea would be to use the extra minor pieces in the middle game to create a weakness for the endgame. Two minor pieces is roughly equal to the rook plus pawn so it doesn't give a clear advantage or disadvantage. It is purely situational so you have to swing the position into your favor.
Hopefully a stronger player will come along and give you some more advice that may be more accurate.
Yeah, you don't want to be looking for an endgame. Attack and you will have an extra piece to put pressure on certain squares.
Do not go for the endgame!!!!!!
"With two pieces against one, you must attack" - Kasparov(?)
Depends on what you mean by "endgame".
The big problem is not to avoid trading pieces, but to avoid trading pawns which opens files and makes the rooks better.It is true that both are generally related, but if you have the choice between the next two positions for example, you must go for the second one, even though you lost much attacking potential (plus, the pieces are temporary inactive,but they will find stuff to do, the rook will not).
Really Want Better Forum??
by candewbetter a few minutes ago
[HURT HEAL] OPENINGS
by vsomani a few minutes ago
Awesome Mates: The Perfect Overthrow!!!!!!!!!
by salatoy 7 minutes ago
3/14/2014 - Mate in 4
by ygangavarapu 8 minutes ago
Why is the Smith-Morra Gambit so popular?
by chessmicky 9 minutes ago
Basic Chess Endings
by SmyslovFan 15 minutes ago
how do i make chess a serious part of my life
by KRAPARSOV 16 minutes ago
Attacking like Paul Morphy
by Grumly06 20 minutes ago
Is this position legal?
by BigDoggProblem 20 minutes ago
The warnings for aborting games
by bobjoerock 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!