Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Daeru(White) vs. browni3141(Black) WITH KIBITZERS


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #1

    Daeru

    I and browni3141 will be playing a game here, we will move one move per day so kibitzers will easily find time to comment.

    I start with

    Good luck!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #2

    browni3141

    I play 1...e5

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #3

    trysts

    I'll do the computerless-trysts-evaluation after each moveWink

    +0.37

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #4

    EdwardT2

    Wrong wrong wrong! 1.Nf3 was just winning! Laughing

    (Trysts - the initiative is worth 0.37 in a symmetrical undeveloped position?)

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #5

    jetfighter13

    these things are popular,

    my suggestion f4 FTW

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #6

    trysts

    EdwardT2 wrote:

    Wrong wrong wrong! 1.Nf3 was just winning!

    (Trysts - the initiative is worth 0.37 in a symmetrical undeveloped position?)

    In my guesstimation, yes. If actual engines disagree with my evaluations, then they will be unplugged until further noticeLaughing

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #7

    browni3141

    trysts wrote:
    EdwardT2 wrote:

    Wrong wrong wrong! 1.Nf3 was just winning!

    (Trysts - the initiative is worth 0.37 in a symmetrical undeveloped position?)

    In my guesstimation, yes. If actual engines disagree with my evaluations, then they will be unplugged until further notice

    They aren't even worth looking at trysts! We all know you're better than a hunk of metal Laughing

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #8

    jetfighter13

    how does f4 evaluate in this position, for me it comes to mat 65

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #9

    trysts

    browni3141 wrote:
    trysts wrote:
    EdwardT2 wrote:

    Wrong wrong wrong! 1.Nf3 was just winning!

    (Trysts - the initiative is worth 0.37 in a symmetrical undeveloped position?)

    In my guesstimation, yes. If actual engines disagree with my evaluations, then they will be unplugged until further notice

    They aren't even worth looking at trysts! We all know you're better than a hunk of metal

    Thank you, browni3141Laughing

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #10

    trysts

    jetfighter13 wrote:

    how does f4 evaluate in this position, for me it comes to mat 65

    I actually have to see the move played by Daeru first, then I take a drink, question my sanity, put on some nice music, get out my rolling tray, wonder about my curtains, read some Cixous, and then evaluate. It's not easyWink

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #11

    EdwardT2

    What are you drinking?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #12

    trysts

    EdwardT2 wrote:

    What are you drinking?

    Wine(Sauvignon Blanc from Australia). Why?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #13

    ChristianSoldier007

    fritz calls f4 less than  -1.00. no appreciation for gambits these days

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #14

    EdwardT2

    Meh

    1.Nf3 > 1.f4

    @Trysts: not a SOUTH Australian Sav-blanc by any chance?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #15

    trysts

    EdwardT2 wrote:

    Meh

    1.Nf3 > 1.f4

    @Trysts: not a SOUTH Australian Sav-blanc by any chance?

    Stoney vineyard.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #16

    EdwardT2

    I don't know Stoney Vineyard. That's not a South Australian wine.

    1.Nf3 > 1.e4 e5 2.f4 as well Laughing

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #17

    Daeru

    My response is normally 2.Nf3 but I am considering 2.Qh5!? to get out of theory very early.  

    Thoughts?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #18

    Samsch

    Daeru wrote:

    My response is normally 2.Nf3 but I am considering 2.Qh5!? to get out of theory very early.  

    Thoughts?

    If your trying to get out of theory without playing a horrible move like Qh5, I would try d3, d4, Nc3, c3, etc.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #19

    ChristianSoldier007

    ooooo, the 1900 just got told by a 1400 Laughing

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #20

    Daeru

    Indeed. Simple opening principle. Don't get the queen out too early. I thought it would be fun to see whether black could punish it or not.

    Let's stick with the opening principles then, shall we?

    I play 2.Nf3 




Back to Top

Post your reply: