Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

How to make illegal positions

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next » | Last Post
24th October 2009, 09:36am
#1
by blagy
Canada
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 206

Use a FEN string. For example:

pppppppp/ppppppp/pppppppp/pppppppp/PPPPPPPP/PPPPPPPP/PPPPPPPP/PPPPPPPP w - - 0 1. This is what the position looks like.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post your own illegal positions here!

 


24th October 2009, 04:15pm
#2
by dnleary
Hobart Australia
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 3415

r3kb1r/pN3ppp/3p1q2/2pNp3/QPB1Pn2/3P1nPb/P1P2P1P/R1B3KR w kq - 0

24th October 2009, 04:26pm
#3
by idosheepallnight
United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 3798
White to move
24th October 2009, 04:29pm
#4
by idosheepallnight
United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 3798
24th October 2009, 04:38pm
#5
by idosheepallnight
United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 3798
24th October 2009, 04:51pm
#6
by SerbianChessStar
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 4012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24th October 2009, 04:58pm
#7
by Paranoid-Android
Maribor Slovenia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 355

dnleary and SerbianChessStar - Nice "find what's wrong with this position".

Stalemate:

Checkmate:
24th October 2009, 05:08pm
#8
by Vance917
USA United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1902

One of those positions seems possible.  That black bishop might not have been a charter member, but might instead have been the result of a promotion.  I mean, assuming that anyone would actually promote to a bishop!

24th October 2009, 05:18pm
#9
by SerbianChessStar
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 4012
Vance917 wrote:

One of those positions seems possible.  That black bishop might not have been a charter member, but might instead have been the result of a promotion.  I mean, assuming that anyone would actually promote to a bishop!


 Very nice! i hadnt thought of that

24th October 2009, 05:28pm
#10
by blagy
Canada
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 206
24th October 2009, 05:39pm
#11
by blagy
Canada
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 206
Vance917 wrote:

One of those positions seems possible.  That black bishop might not have been a charter member, but might instead have been the result of a promotion.  I mean, assuming that anyone would actually promote to a bishop!


Yes, but none of the white pawns have moved, but the white rook has jumped over them. So that last position of SerbianChessStar's is illegal.

24th October 2009, 05:42pm
#12
by Paranoid-Android
Maribor Slovenia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 355

Another illegal checkmate:

24th October 2009, 05:46pm
#13
by blagy
Canada
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 206
24th October 2009, 05:55pm
#14
by SerbianChessStar
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 4012
blagy wrote:
Vance917 wrote:

One of those positions seems possible.  That black bishop might not have been a charter member, but might instead have been the result of a promotion.  I mean, assuming that anyone would actually promote to a bishop!


Yes, but none of the white pawns have moved, but the white rook has jumped over them. So that last position of SerbianChessStar's is illegal.


 and my second one was illegal, my first one was the only legal one/.

24th October 2009, 05:57pm
#15
by blagy
Canada
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 206
24th October 2009, 06:17pm
#16
by Paranoid-Android
Maribor Slovenia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 355

Illegal:
Legal:
24th October 2009, 06:26pm
#17
by khpa21
Minnesota United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 1234
[COMMENT DELETED]
24th October 2009, 08:27pm
#18
by blagy
Canada
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 206
Paranoid-Android wrote:

 

Illegal:
Legal:

The second position is illegal because white doesn't have a king!

25th October 2009, 01:58am
#19
by Paranoid-Android
Maribor Slovenia
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 355
blagy wrote:
Paranoid-Android wrote:

 

Illegal:
Legal:

The second position is illegal because white doesn't have a king!


I knew somebody will point this out. Since king isn't necessary to give a checkmate (except opponent's king), I didn't include him in any of the positions I posted. Just imagine that white's king is on a8 in all of the positions if you must.

25th October 2009, 08:28am
#20
by blagy
Canada
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 206
« Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.