11115 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
yep I am cool with that
im going to input the position after Qg4 into Houdini overnight (about 9 hours) and publish the results in the morning
hey guys after 16.Qg4 doesnt d5 just win outright?
and Houdini came up with that line, better in the position is 17. Qd4
better, but still loses
well Black takes the bishop and is getting mated, so this saves the bishop, and it prevents the already annoying Qf4+
How does black get mated? 17. Qd4 dxc4 18. e6+ (I guess that would be the move) 18. ... f6 and now what?
sorry forgot that the pawn could move sorry, but e7 would come, and now white has some options
houdini says to take the pawn. Qd4 doesnt earn you anything
all white has now is hope chess, Qg4 is an all out blunder
after Qd4 Nc6 is even better. Sorry Jet, but Qg4 is refuted
well it wasn't the worst that could happen, 6 or 7 days worth of human analysis didn't find the refutation, so the game would get very interesting after that
lol what happened is after Qg4 I found d6 and stuck with that and we spend 7 days analyzing that line, but if I had been studying the position after Qg4 I would have sought other alternatives. Funny how we were all debating d6 when d5 was right in front of our faces the whole time.
The conclusion of this is that although 0-0 seems dangerous and terrible at first, it actually wins the game. Thats what I loved so much about playing it, is that no one saw it coming
here is my chess coach's analysis of it (I emailed him the game)
Interesting game - I have a few thoughts on this one:
1) I'm not sure about 9.Nh4. Maybe White should play 9.Rg1 here? Looks strange to walk into the path of the dark-square bishop, but then his idea of pushing the g-pawn has the potential to be even stronger.
2) 9...g5 is optimistic. White could play 10.Nf5 here, which also covers the g3 square. As played I think you had a a strong possibility in 11...Qc6!, which is an improved version of the text move (11...Bxd4).
3) I don't like 12...Be3 for you. You should develop with 12...Nc6 or even take on h5 (since 12...Qxh5 13.Qxd4? isn't possible due to 13...Qf3+ 14.Kg1 Rg8#).
4) Developing with 14.Nc3! is stronger than what White played.
He mentions that 16.Qg4 is better than the blunder he made (16.e6??), but that should also lose (simplest is 16...d5).
Offbeat opening where you're behind in development, but good game!
Im gonna make a diagram with all current analysis
ok guys lets not do the analysis since i already solved it
Strong Dedicated Computers
by SeamusORiley 2 minutes ago
by kco 5 minutes ago
defensive and offensive openings
by Kingdom_Hearts 6 minutes ago
Queen's Gambit. Accept or Decline?
by Fiveofswords 11 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by 9kick9 11 minutes ago
by KissMyRook01645 14 minutes ago
8/14/2014 - Oliveira Vs. Menchik Montevideo 1939
by mauve_penguin 21 minutes ago
Converting Chess.com to USCF
by steve_bute 25 minutes ago
A good 15 second work out Chess Gym
by tellmeaboutit 27 minutes ago
Is Your Player A Toy ?
by ROBB_CHESS 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!