11084 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The second position is also possible:
Congratulations to both of you!
More positions coming up.
which of these positions is legal? (composed by cobra91):
here's another one, black can still castle on both sides but that doesn't really matter
is it too hard or is it too easy that nobody wants to answer?
Not many people are active in this thread, and those that are aren't always here. Give it time.
Anyway, thanks for contributing for the thread. I'll give your position a shot.
Alright here's the analysis:
Black has promoted all of his pawns. In order to achieve that, he must have made a minimum of 6 captures with his pawns. White is missing exactly 6 pieces, so all of them must have been captured.
This means that black's a, b, g, and h pawns couldn't have captured a piece on the way to promotion. Here I had to think about it, but it is possible thanks to black's missing bishops.
What's nice about this position is the symmetry, as play is basically the same on both wings.
you're right Shoopi!
here´s the answer without promotion:
Funny that both of our solutions took exactly 60 moves to complete
I know it can be done in less, but the question is, how much less? what is the least amount of moves necessary to reach this position?
This might be a new fun challenge to work on (by the way, the problems I posted on 163# are still up for solving )
Maybe it's for the best, since now people can't copy what you already did and try to find a small improvement that you missed
I'll try to do this now.
Ok, I analysed the position for quite a bit and looked at many different ideas. Unfortunately, many did not seem to work.
I managed to get 54 moves rather quickly, but then finding an improvement became much more difficult. Eventually I found a way to get 53 moves which, I believe is the best possible.
Can anyone find 54 or 53 moves? or god forbid, a better score
Also, here's a guideline on how to approach the puzzles in #163:
1) Can black get all of those promoted pieces?
2) What were the last moves?
I will also give a small hint straight away regarding which position is legal, to encourage people to try (highlight to see): Position 1 is illegal and position 2 is legal. So you might want to work on that one.
If no one seems interested (or has given up) in trying, I will post the solution!
I got the 53 eventually, will try for 52 now :)
Impressive! I wonder if we used the same method. I couldn't figure out a way to get 52, but I've seen crazier things happen!
My method was (highlight to see)
Shift all the white pieces along one to allow athe rooks on one side of the board an extra square for maneuvring
I think 52 is impossible but don't know. I might have a go at that #163 tomorrow now I've got a hint to help me :)
Yeah I think so too. We also probably used the same method to reach 53 moves. Here's mine:
52 , the white first-rank-shifting was unneccesary but I had put it in anyway and didnt feel like re-entering the game
For #163 the last white move must have been a pawn move (or for #1 1.Rh5+ N4xh5# but I doubt the composer left any spare white pieces)
In position 2 Black can play N4h5# with the same position as #1 except for a rook. But I have no idea why f5 would be a legal rook position and c4 not, I suppose I'll only figure out if i do loads of analysis of the position
Windows Phone 8 Beta Testers Needed
by Moztax a few minutes ago
9/16/2014 - Knight After Knight
by stelioxnight 8 minutes ago
Is there ANYONE who can challenge ZOD?
by stelioxnight 11 minutes ago
Does this violate TOS?
by FrankD72 27 minutes ago
Komodo 8 FALSE! Propaganda.
by mcris 29 minutes ago
Mate with two bishops... or not
by dwz 32 minutes ago
True or false? Chess will never be solved! why?
by watcha 52 minutes ago
Is 8 hours of chess enough for a 4 year old future world champion?
by warriorfannumber1 53 minutes ago
Online Website to Analyze Games?
by abhishekSiM 60 minutes ago
Unable to move pieces in live chess
by Blackenne 71 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!