9273 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
WindowsEnthusiast
White to move. Does either side win by force?
echecs06
e4
jerry2468
Q on g1 - d4
DrSpudnik
Aaaaaa! My brain!
riuryK
joseph_ward
Do the pawns on b8 and g1 promote instantly?
No
Ex-parrot
Why not?
II-Oliveira
If no pawn can be moved the game must be a tedious knight only battle until one of them falls in the pawn area.
Yeah, but who ultimately wins?
It's not sideways chess if they do.
The only winners are the people who didn't read this thread.
Assuming no blunders are made, the game will be a draw. Here is how I arrive at this conclusion:
1. At the beginning of the game, only the knights and rooks are capable of moving. Only the knights can leave the a- and h- files.
2. The only way to change this situation is to capture a piece with a pawn or capture a pawn.
3. Whoever gets any of their pieces freed up first will have, if not a win, at least a much greater chance of winning. Therefore, neither side wants to free up any of their opponent's pieces.
4. There is a way to checkmate on f3 or c5. For example, if the pieces are positioned correctly, White can move a knight to c5 with check, have it be captured by the b6-pawn, and recapture with the other knight, resulting in smothered mate. However, this attack requires two knights, whereas only one is needed to defend.
5. Therefore, in order to win in this way, a player first needs to eliminate both enemy knights while retaining both of his own. The opponent, however, can prevent this by placing his knights in such a way that they are protecting both each other and the vulnerable f3/c5 square. (For example, Black can accomplish this by playing Nc3, Nc8, Nd6, and Nce4.) He can then move his rooks back and forth to his heart's content.
The game can be summarized as follows:
a) Either side can force a draw; and
b) It takes fewer moves to prevent a loss than it does to threaten a win.
Thus, a game will play out in one of two ways. Either one player will play for a draw (and achieve one), or both players will try for a win. If the second scenario occurs, eventually one of the players will threaten an immediate win, which the other will then have to prevent. The defending player will have to abandon his attack, but he will be successful in preventing a loss. He will be forced to begin playing for a draw, which turns the game into an instance of the first scenario.
Unrated Why?
by Jackster1000 a few minutes ago
Why Isn't Carlsen the World Champion?
by pellik 3 minutes ago
Relationship bewteen Chess rating and I.Q?
by ciljettu 4 minutes ago
Wht Bobby Fischer would have beaten Kasparov.
by Ruby-Fischer 4 minutes ago
When It Rains, It Pours
by backrankblues 5 minutes ago
New Site Design Feedback
by paul211 8 minutes ago
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by Helzeth 9 minutes ago
The deadly opening traps
by pellik 11 minutes ago
MAJOR MALFUNTION WITH LAST GAME!!!
by htdavidht 14 minutes ago
Queen's Gambit question
by benonidoni 16 minutes ago