^ Click here to remove ads! ^

undead bigshop

« Forums home
Forums > Fun With Chess
Post New Topic
Jump to forum:
 
10th April 2008, 09:56pm
#1
by God2
Malaysia
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1082


11th April 2008, 03:46am
#2
by JF1
United Kingdom
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 138
nice one, i didnt see how white was going to get out of that mate!
11th April 2008, 05:06am
#3
by God2
Malaysia
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1082
do you feel the bigshop is alive?drag the piece and save the bigshop!
11th April 2008, 05:10am
#4
by 3021025
Netherlands
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 54
Nice one.
11th April 2008, 08:34am
#5
by God2
Malaysia
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1082
this puzzle show the important of bigshop taken the good position
11th April 2008, 10:35am
#6
by Selangor
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1057
Well .......(Selangor)
11th April 2008, 11:02am
#7
by Kingfisher
zagreb Croatia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 1174

Why Rg8+?

Rg4+ Bg5 Rxg5#

solves things quicker


11th April 2008, 11:21am
#8
by Loomis
Durham, NC United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2165
Kingfisher, 2. Rg4+ f6 and there's no mate in sight. (your line, 2. Rg4+ Bg5 isn't even a legal move)
11th April 2008, 11:51am
#9
by NM tonydal
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 950
Kingfisher wrote:

Why Rg8+?

Rg4+ Bg5 Rxg5#

solves things quicker

 2... Qxb2 mate.


11th April 2008, 12:03pm
#10
by Kingfisher
zagreb Croatia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 1174

Loomis,

 

Rg4 opens the a1-h8 diagonal, where the  bishop on b2 hits the king on h8 via discovered check. f6 and Qxb2 do counter that (thank you, I see it now), but the move is perfectly legal.


11th April 2008, 12:14pm
#11
by Loomis
Durham, NC United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2165
Kingfisher, it was Bg5 that wasn't legal because it didn't block the discovered check.
11th April 2008, 12:21pm
#12
by dalmatinac
Croatia
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 3079
2.Rg4 Qxb2#
11th April 2008, 12:23pm
#13
by dalmatinac
Croatia
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 3079
Nisi u pravu Kingfisher na 2.Rg4+ crni daje mat on Qxb2#.To je apsolutno legalni potez jer nema dvostrukog saha.
12th April 2008, 01:19am
#14
by Kingfisher
zagreb Croatia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 1174
Loomis wrote: Kingfisher, it was Bg5 that wasn't legal because it didn't block the discovered check.

 Ah, right. Sorry, I missunderstood you.


 
^ Back to top

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.