Rubik's cube can be solved from any position by following a simple algorithm. Once you know the algorithm, it's merely a matter of applying it.
The same is not true of beating a chess master.
Tell that to Rybka.
Rubik's cube can be solved from any position by following a simple algorithm. Once you know the algorithm, it's merely a matter of applying it.
The same is not true of beating a chess master.
Tell that to Rybka.
I think that also works against chess masters, unless they double as a kung fu master.
At last I got a laugh out of this stupid thread.
Okay, give me one good reason why one-handed solving should be harder than two-handed solving.
I think it sounds much more physically challenging.
I'm sorry, I see some people have hated this thread this is one of my rarer forums I often talk about something chess. I guess I thought people would get a kick out of it
Rubik's cube can be solved from any position by following a simple algorithm. Once you know the algorithm, it's merely a matter of applying it.
The same is not true of beating a chess master.
algorithms there are more than one