Kingpatzer wrote:
Rubik's cube can be solved from any position by following a simple algorithm. Once you know the algorithm, it's merely a matter of applying it.
The same is not true of beating a chess master.
Tell that to Rybka.
Which is harder: Playing a chess master or solving a rubik's cube
Sort:
ClavierCavalier wrote:
nate23 wrote:
I think that also works against chess masters, unless they double as a kung fu master.
At last I got a laugh out of this stupid thread. 
Whats harder rubiks cube blindfolded or 1 handed
Are you serious?
yea
A serious cokelover.
yea
Okay, give me one good reason why one-handed solving should be harder than two-handed solving.
You two appeared "so-in" to each other.
MaartenSmit wrote:
Okay, give me one good reason why one-handed solving should be harder than two-handed solving.
I think it sounds much more physically challenging.
I'm sorry, I see some people have hated this thread this is one of my rarer forums I often talk about something chess. I guess I thought people would get a kick out of it
and they did.
solving rubic's cube is a lot more easier!!!!than "beating a GM"
who are in that picture, AndyClifton?
twoawesomepeople123 wrote:
who are in that picture, AndyClifton?
It's a family photo. That's how they settle disputes in the Clifton household.
That idiot brother of mine tried to use the wrong fork for his salad again. I hate that!
Another great rivalry: the Jets vs. the Sharks.
Rubik's cube can be solved from any position by following a simple algorithm. Once you know the algorithm, it's merely a matter of applying it.
The same is not true of beating a chess master.
algorithms there are more than one