1. ... c5 is inaccurate??

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1


    I recently submitted a Sicilian game I lost as black for computer analysis here on chess.com and I just realized that the computer is saying that c5 is an inaccurate response to 1. e4. How can that be? Is the chess engine faulty?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #2


    ya chess.com engine sucks.... 

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #3


    True, chess engine(s) are faulty and naughty in openings. Wink Kidding a bit, but it's true that sometimes it gives wrong evaluation of the game, or some wrong mistakes, especially in the openings. However, 1...c5 is totally correct and acceptable. 

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #4


    The chess.com computer has completely refuted the Sicilian ages ago. Then it started demolishing the Caro-Kann. I expect it to completely solve chess by the end of the year.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #5



    I see now that this is a well-documented issue. I'll be interested to find out how it solves chess so I can start playing that line in every game. Tongue Out


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #6


    It may be more accurate to look at the opening database with Sicillian getting a 62.4% sucess rate (win/draw) against white.

Back to Top

Post your reply: