Started playing chess actively quite recently, this is a game which I felt, until the end, was a game which was lacking few errors (for my level of play), and has taught me two things.

1. Queens aren't the only piece on the board; you can cope fine without them

2. Victories aren't always from quick attacks.

 

Rate it! I've added a few notes.

30 ... fxe6 wins your Bishop.

Also, the Nxe6 fork  threatened on move 21 would have been a fair exchange of material.

In move 14 trying to exhange queens was bad because you left your knight hanging.  Maybe the time controls were really fast(I make all kinds of stupid mistakes in blitz)  do not know you did not say but but your opponent should have played pawn takes knight on the next move instead of attacking the rook . You got lucky he did not. But if this was lik 1 0 or 2 0 blitz sometimes just making the move your opponent does not expect is good even if it is a bad move. I am assuming the time controls were rather fast considering your opponent missed the back rank mate as well.

looks like you left your pretty pretty much left that same knight hanging in move 17 as well  Where was it going to go after Rac1? Lucky again.

When was a bank rank mate available for black, onehandgun?

Also, I assume you mean Rac8 instead of Rac1. If Rac1 was played, then Bxc1 Rxc1 Nxd5 and a fair exchange.

and on move 21 trading two minor pieces for a rook and pawn if black plays fxe6 does not give you any advantage. I would have happily played fxe6 alreadying being up a couple of pawns.

then on move 28 you left your bishop hanging as you no longer have the knight fork.

 Now I am really assuming the time controls were super fast.  

  

Stop saying stuff that I've already said.

I just said stuff as I clicked through the game from the first post. sorry.