22 Nxb3 is sorta unnecessary in my opionion
29. d3 leads to a quicker mate or passed pawn and a Q+R+R vs bishop endgame
22 Nxb3 is sorta unnecessary in my opionion
29. d3 leads to a quicker mate or passed pawn and a Q+R+R vs bishop endgame
On move 7 you said:
"Not a very good move, because of Lg4"
I supose it was because of "Loper", the bishop in Dutch.
It reminds me of the times I write 2.Cf3 instead of 2.Nf3. And also when I misunderstand a Rook move for a King move, as R is used for the King (Rei) in Portuguese.
On move 7 you said:
"Not a very good move, because of Lg4"
I supose it was because of "Loper", the bishop in Dutch.
It reminds me of the times I write 2.Cf3 instead of 2.Nf3. And also when I misunderstand a Rook move for a King move, as R is used for the King (Rei) in Portuguese.
Indeed, i meant Bg4.
Well played, you didn't make any major mistakes (as opposed to your opponent). One thing, though: as you yourself noted, it's best to trade away pieces when you're winning. Still, you avoided trading queens to the very end. It turned out okay, but it's always a risk (especially at your level) when your opponent still has enough pieces to cause mayhem. I remember losing a game when I was three pawns up because I didn't exchange queens when I could have.
So, you could have moved 14... Qxf2 to force an exchange of queens. You were up two rooks and two pawns for a single bishop, which is a crushing advantage in an endgame. However, by the time you got to move 34, exchanging queens was probably no longer necessary and would only have prolonged the game (because your opponent obviously wasn't going to resign). Still, it definitely wouldn't have worsened your position.
This is a game which I played at turn based chess. I'd like to have your comments on what moves were good, on what are bad ones and more ;)