A see-sawing affair

Jump to forum:
 
23rd November 2008, 06:38pm
#1
by Upabushtrack
Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 1920

I think I played well above my usual standard in this game. Feel free to point out my glaring howlers but constructive criticism would be much more appreciated.

Sorry about the early annotations being in the wrong places but they don't seem to want to get edited.

23rd November 2008, 07:50pm
#2
by Head_Hunter
East Orange, NJ United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 413

Well played. Your opponent played you as he was waiting for you to blunder, but never did blunder (yes, you made mistakes, but no blunders.) These wins are extra satisfying. What I found most impressive about your play was your finish. Excellent, my friend. Excellent!

PS...Study endgame theory and you'll hold your own with most players.

23rd November 2008, 08:38pm
#3
by Upabushtrack
Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 1920

Thanks for the encouragement Ty. As for my endgame I'm only just starting to get further into studying more than straight K+P endings so far. Know of any books that cover the main themes in a clear, concise manner?

24th November 2008, 07:41pm
#4
by Head_Hunter
East Orange, NJ United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 413

I have this book called Basic Chess Endings by Reuben Fine (Revised by Pal Benko). It's an oldie. Because of its age and size (585 pages), this book is often called 'The Bible of Endgames.'

Copy and paste the address below for a closer look:

http://www.amazon.com/Basic-Chess-Endings-Reuben-Fine/dp/0812934938/ref=sr_11_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1227577110&sr=11-1

23rd December 2008, 06:13pm
#5
by donngerard
Cebu Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 3559

great game ....!!!

congratulations for beating a player

rated higher than you 200 points ^_^

8th January 2009, 05:13pm
#6
by charlesmarlow
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 50

I think 3.. e3 was a bit passive, locking in your dark bishop. (though black gets you out of this by taking on d4).

This is a minor gripe though, you capitalized on 6.. b6 and 7.. a5 well. Your opponent didnt have to lose a piece, but is stuck with a bad position in any case

8th January 2009, 09:18pm
#7
by PhilipN
Oregon United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 871

The move e3 may appear passive, but it is used in many if not most positions arising from 1. d4.  I often like to use that move of the e-pawn when I play the Sicilian (except there it's pawn to e6 instead of e3).

9th January 2009, 06:07pm
#8
by charlesmarlow
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 50

e3 is often played as park of queen pawn openings, but often after white has developed the dark bishop.

In this case especially, responding to blacks counter-attack of 2...c4  with 3. e3 ceeds the initiative to black, imho.

9th January 2009, 06:15pm
#9
by SirDavid
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 501

Doesn't 38. Nc5 win the e-pawn? If Nc2 counterattacking you can play Qxe6+ or if you prefer Nxa6 Nxe1 Nc7 and your king can stop the d-pawn in time.

9th January 2009, 06:20pm
#10
by Peregrin__Took
Foxborough, Mass United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 55

I agree with the e3 move. I don't understand why you moved 4. Nc3 after black did 3...Nf6.

9th January 2009, 06:31pm
#11
by Upabushtrack
Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 1920

SirDavid: Thanks for pointing that one out. It would have taken a lot of the stress out of the endgame for me without that 5 pawn chain marching down the board. The worst oversight by me that was pointed out was 12. Nb5!! instead of Ba3??.     I could have blown him off the board early.

9th January 2009, 06:34pm
#12
by Upabushtrack
Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 1920

Peregrin_Took: I played Nc3 to discourage him from dropping his Knight into the hole on e4.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.