15273 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I played this tactical game recently. It was very interesting a I wondered if anyone could see any improvements.
Regarding the question about threefold repetition at the move 17 variation: No, it is not yet threefold, as the condition is "the possible moves of all the pieces of both players are the same" including en passant and castling.
18. 0-0-0 was cute. The king is strangely safer there than after 18. 0-0 f3!, but your analysed 18. Nxf4 is stronger for sure.
21. g4 is a nice idea. I like it. 21. g4 fxg3 e.p. (the best try?) 22. Rdg1!? gxf2 23. Rg5 Qf3 24. Qc1 with chaos, though.
23. c5!? might have been interesting too. Weakens e5, and perhaps you can pile on the g-file, e5 and g7 like in the game, just a few moves earlier.
25. c5 is very nice. Beautiful and a natural continuation to the attack, involving the queen.
Thanks for the suggestions. I hadn't seen the idea of allowing gxf2 when I played g4 I was going to open the f-file, but that is perhaps better.
23. c5 looks interesting, but if I follow up with f3 then the rook on h1 may be lost in some lines after Bxf3.
I was kind of luckly to find c5, after realising there was nothing to be gained from f3, giving up a rook on g4, or taking on f5, I played c5 pretty quickly because it at least did some stuff. Fortunately it worked out.
Thanks for the answer on the three-fold repitition thing, I should probably have a better understanding of the rules, but these things come up so rarely that it is hard to remember all the details.
18.O-O-O as you said, Nxf4 is better. Personally I have no problem with O-O as well. I have defended these things a million times and f3 is the obvious move, but I don't see it as a problem. White has many resources and that f -pawn is really weak.
21.g4, too ambitious in my opinion. Black defended poorly and should have tried to remove your knight on d5.
25.c5 is a good move and of course should be looked at earlier as well.
The rest is fine.
Thanks, I am not 100% sure, but I think after Nd5 Be7 is theory, rather than Nxd5.
Is being self taught good or bad?
by The_Ghostess_Lola a few minutes ago
by originaleaz a few minutes ago
How do you feel about players who win by cowardly queening a pawn
by Till_98 2 minutes ago
7/24/2014 - Mate in 5
by snake_babu 4 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by Pacifique 5 minutes ago
i dont understand this GM's thought process...
by mattyf9 10 minutes ago
Poker Chess Magic The Gathering Baccarat
by Till_98 15 minutes ago
Hou Yifan preparing to replace Judit Polgar as Women's #1?
by ielosubmarine 36 minutes ago
PHOTOS and VIDEOS
by craftysusie 40 minutes ago
Don't checkmate the King
by Akatsuki64 46 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!