6959 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
eXcellion
This was my second third game on www.chess.com (and the first one where I had the clever idea of copying the game (algebraic notation?)
I would like to ask you, people who have way more exp. then me, to analyse my game.
I know that white could have played a much stronger game, but I will have made mistakes aswell (he just wasn't able to exploit them because he didn't see them, nor did I )
What I want from you guys is some pointers as what I should work on, or things I didn't see in this game, mistakes I made, that, if he would have seen it, I would have lost a lot of material/position
erik
i would generally say that when you post a game where you beat somebody to a bloody pulp like you just did, people won't help analyze the game :) people generally help analyze losses, not crushing victories :) those are best for the game showcase :D
likesforests
Agreed; losses are more instructive than victories. If you have no losses, play stronger opponents, and you will get some soon enough. :)
sstteevveenn
Not much to say there really! Won by a landslide, and while I probably dont have much more experience than you I dont think you did much wrong at all. Just about the only useful thing I can say is, to delete a variation you have to promote it first to the main variation.
RELee1863
9.Nxh1 would be better in my oppinion but other than that, you did good. Next time post losses so we can help you learn from mistakes
RELee1865 wrote: 9.Nxh1 would be better in my oppinion but other than that, you did good. Next time post losses so we can help you learn from mistakes
Why would that have been better?
I've always read that the treat is in some cases bigger then the power of the attack itself.
I think that if I would have just taken his rook immediately, I would have lost a lot of control, while if I didn't, he had to keep everything together, and there was way more pressure on him.
(I've also posted a loss ^^ - you might analyse that aswell? :D)
Greetz
GatoNegro
@eXcellion,
I think it's a better idea to analyse the game yourself before requesting others to analyse it for you.
Good luck!
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by jesterville a few minutes ago
Mate With 4 Knights!!
by AnkitSarkar 4 minutes ago
Interesting game. Please help.
by stephen_33 6 minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by MoTs-sama 9 minutes ago
Colle System
by DomcaxD 12 minutes ago
which opening is better? Traxler or Double Muzio gambit?
by alexlaw 24 minutes ago
Sharing your repertoire, good or bad?
by TwoMove 43 minutes ago
5/20/2012 - Mate in 3
by stm01 45 minutes ago
Playing a Symetrical London System
by pfren 50 minutes ago
iPad App
by blackstarzes 51 minutes ago