^ Click here to remove ads! ^

any symphonic variation?

Jump to forum:
 
20th February 2008, 06:44pm
#1
by hely74copter
Arlington, TX United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 35

hello fellow community of chess...

 i'd like to have your feedback regarding a game i played on aol.com. i lost that game per time expiring, it was set for 15 minutes, and then i had less power to go on, even with more time.

please, look at the game and tell me what would have been your symphonic variation at the move 22, when i put a lot of power and then just chasing the enemy king and not able to mate.

 

any answer and comment is fully appreciate.

my regards,

carlo

 

 

 


20th February 2008, 06:52pm
#2
by sentinel_hawk
United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 13
Yeah, unless I'm missing something after play you could win the Q for the rook and one of the bishops along with picking up the end bisop over there, your going to be a rook down with a horrid pawn structure going into the end game.
25th February 2008, 11:29pm
#3
by holdonice
Meadowview United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 8

It seems to me that it was just to clogged up.Now when you drove the king to the side you could have done some things differently to checkmate him..You could have played for the pieces but keeping him in check would have been better

 


26th February 2008, 04:12am
#4
by Kaniksu
Metaline Falls, WA United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 27
24. Rxc7##.  There was some interesting tactics for both sides in this game, and a fighting spirit.
26th February 2008, 04:53am
#5
by crowfoot
LA Austria
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 7

rook d7 would be a nice one

 


26th February 2008, 06:54pm
#6
by Kaniksu
Metaline Falls, WA United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 27
crowfoot wrote:

rook d7 would be a nice one

 


 Assuming you mean 24.Rd7+ (24...Kxd7).  Why not the immediate mate?


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.