11167 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
here is a game i recently played, I believe i played well but i lost due to an unavoidable mate. ( i cant believe i didnt see it).
I have lightly annotated it as i havent got much time. Any suggestions on mistakes/ improving my game would be great. Thanks
I would say advancing your king pawns in order to win a piece is fine, as long as you can get enough defenders over to protect your king. Looks similar to the noah's ark trap, on the opposite side of the board.
I think you should have taken with your rook on 29, keeping your queen near your king, which is fine on the diagonal with no potential bishop pins.
Then I think you just need to get the pieces off the board asap, you should be winning.
good game openfile too bad I didnt look to see that trap well done! You did have a winning position, but I showed the concept of not resigning when losing... I think that is another lesson that can be taken from this
Yeh, i agree i will have to play you again some time.
1) Moving pawns in front of your king in exchange for gaining a piece should generally be worth it if there is no devastating attack. 15.g4/16.f4/17.f5 were very good.
2) Important is that those files in front of your king are not opened. I personally would never grab the g or h pawn and rather sacrifice pawns to keep those files closed. That's why I don't like 20.g5 h6 21.Qg4 hxg5 opening the h-file - giving Black attacking chances - nor 29.Qxg7?? opening the g-file. Certainly not worth a pawn.
3) Trading pieces when you are up material is generally a good idea, but not at price of opening dangerous files. Instead of your 20.g5 plan "exchanging material" you should have followed even more important strategic plans like "activating undeveloped pieces" (take a look at a1/b1/c1/d1, e.g. play 20.Nd2 heading for Nf3/Nc4 or Be3 or Bf4) or "attacking" / "occupying open files/diagonals/ranks" (Qd5 and Qf3 look huge because nobody's there on the long a8-h1 diagonal).
4) Instead of 29.Qxg7 I would not have touched the g-pawn (though Rxg7 looks quite possible) but rather have attacked with 29.Qc6, e.g. with the follow up of 30.Nc4 threatening 31.Rxc7+ Qxc7 32.Nb6+ Kb8 33.Qa8#. Being up material does not mean you have to defend and reach a safe endgame. You still can attack and either force exchanges this way or - even better - mate the enemy's king.
Good luck in your games!
12.Qd1 (?) : better is 12.Nd4, forcing the trade of queens (or winning a piece) due to the pin.
15.g4 seems fine to me, because Black has no attack here and his king is not safe either.hey, it wins a piece !
20.g5 ? is more suspicious. It doesn't even achieve his aim of 'blocking the bishop' after ...h6, and opens the dangerous h file.
And after that game, I hope you will never play 29.Qxg7 ?? anymore !
As an answer to b_complex : if you are up in material, generally speaking, you should trade and go for a won endgame where you have less chances to blunder. But sometimes you can't (because your opponent refuses the trades, and you can't force it), and you have to play actively not to lose, which is the case here where your king is still under serious attack.
What were the time controls on this game? Is this a blitz game?
Thanks for all the analysis, yeh i will definately not play Qxg7 again. "Transpo" It was an online game, 3 days per move .
Then some mistakes are unfogivable for correspondance chess (including Qxg7 !). Transform my (?)s in ?s and my ?s in ??s in my analysis !
I thought it was something like 30 min / player. But of course it's the same if you have 100 correspondance games going in the same time...
I totally agree with you. I hope I didn't claim anything different.
7/2/2015 - Mate in 5
by colinsaul a few minutes ago
3/22/2015 - Mate in 2
by turkhuu_5 4 minutes ago
The paradox of perfect chess
by ab121705 10 minutes ago
When a coward refuses to resign.......
by aerodarts 13 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Chess Champions
by AlisonHart 13 minutes ago
blitz/bullet rating is the only thing that matters in internet chess
by Ziryab 17 minutes ago
3/23/2015 - Knights Tour
by turkhuu_5 17 minutes ago
6/3/2015 - No Good Choice
by ekkal 18 minutes ago
observers are distraction
by tkbunny 21 minutes ago
by jonnin 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!