Forums

Can someone analyze this chess960 game?

Sort:
chessplayer31415926

 

 

Any help would be appreciated

Boogalicious

yeah 6.g4 also weakened his kingside.

13...Bb6 was an inaccuracy. You could have played 13...Nc4, threatening ...d4 and maybe an outpost with ...Ne3. If White reacted to this threat by playing e3, then you'd win the a3 pawn with tempo on his rook.

29...Nc7 was an unneeded retreat. You could have just played 29...Ra8 to cover the a4-pawn.

38...Nd5 blocks your open file. Why not play 38...Rd3 and double rooks on the d-file.

That's all I've got. I'm sure a better player would see some more things. Constructive critiscism aside, well done on the win, but also for analyzing your game. It's a great way to improve Smile 

chessplayer31415926

hello, anyone?

TheGreatOogieBoogie
Scottrf

You need to learn how pawns capture. I think any further analysis is superfluous.

chessplayer31415926
TheGreatOogieBoogie wrote:
 

I think you kind of messed up with the moves. You didn't copy them right...

Here, use this instead:

[Event "empires under <1200 chess960 - Board 2"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2014.06.01"]
[White "blackrabbitto"]
[Black "chessplayer31415926"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "1147"]
[BlackElo "1253"]
[TimeControl "1 in 3 days"]
[Termination "chessplayer31415926 won by checkmate"]
[Variant "Chess 960"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "brnbqknr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/BRNBQKNR w KQkq - 0 1"]

1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.h3 b6 4.Nd3 Nd6 5.Nfe5 O-O 6.g4 Nfe4 7.O-O c5 8.b3 Bc7 9.f3 f6 10.dxc5 Nxc5
 11.Nxc5 bxc5 12.Nd3 Qc6 13.a3 Bb6 14.Kh1 c4 15.Nb4 Qb7 16.c3 a5 17.Nc2 e5 18.b4 a4 19.Qg3 Nf7 20.Ne1 Qa7
 21.Ng2 Ng5 22.h4 Ne6 23.Bb2 Bc7 24.Qf2 Qxf2 25.Rxf2 Bb6 26.Rf1 Bc6 27.Bc1 Nc7 28.h5 Nb5 29.Bb2 Nc7 30.e4 dxe4
 31.fxe4 Bxe4 32.Rc1 Bc6 33.Rc2 Rbd8 34.Kh2 Nd5 35.Bf3 Ne7 36.Bxc6 Nxc6 37.Re2 Ne7 38.Nh4 Nd5 39.Nf3 Nf4 40.Re4 Rc8
 41.Nd2 Rfd8 42.Nxc4 Rxc4 43.Rxc4 Rd2+ 44.Kh1 Rxb2 45.Rd1 Ne2 46.Rc8+ Kf7 47.Rd7+ Ke6 48.Rb7 Ng3# 0-1

chessplayer31415926
Scottrf wrote:

You need to learn how pawns capture. I think any further analysis is superfluous.

I don't see why I need to learn about how pawns capture...

Boogalicious
[COMMENT DELETED]
Scottrf
chessplayer31415926 wrote:
Scottrf wrote:

You need to learn how pawns capture. I think any further analysis is superfluous.

I don't see why I need to learn about how pawns capture...

Apologies, boogie posted the game wrongly.

TheGreatOogieBoogie

Don't understand how, I copied it from the get PGN. 

Edit: it was because I looked at it in Chessbase and the reupload omitted the castling :( 



chessplayer31415926
Boogalicious wrote:

Why ask for analysis at all? If you're so self-centered, as you seem to be, do it yourself.

Or play an easier game like tic-tac-toe.

The game was copied wrong, as you see, so it seems like I don't know the pawns. See above for the real game

chessplayer31415926

Anyone else?

kleelof

I've never played 960. Is it only the pieces tha re mixed up? Not the pawns too?

kleelof
alexm2310 wrote:

Kleelof they switch the d and f pawns, can make pawn breaks really confusing xD

WOW. I guess chess960 IS much harder than I thought.Laughing

chessplayer31415926
kleelof wrote:
alexm2310 wrote:

Kleelof they switch the d and f pawns, can make pawn breaks really confusing xD

WOW. I guess chess960 IS much harder than I thought.

All they do is randomly put the pieces but the bishops have to be on opposite colors, the rooks have to be on both sides of the king, and all the pawns have to be on the second rank.

Boogalicious
chessplayer31415926 wrote:
Boogalicious wrote:

Why ask for analysis at all? If you're so self-centered, as you seem to be, do it yourself.

Or play an easier game like tic-tac-toe.

The game was copied wrong, as you see, so it seems like I don't know the pawns. See above for the real game

My apologies to you! I guess I hadn't taken my happy pills that day.