i guess 24.rd-f7 # was too easy

good game you won even though u missed a cheakmate do u think c3 was unnesserecery c4 instead and if ba6 the qc2 alot more treateng

 on which number move?

yea I saw opponent missed a checkmate on me. Sometimes in a timed game you dont notice certain things as if you would study board for hours

You don't need hours to spot a mate in 1. Also, black missed an easy win with 21..Qxd1+ 22.QxQ Nxh7

 Its all chess psychology my friend, as Emanuel Lasker stated. That is why Emanuel Lasker maintained world champion longer than any other player in chess history. After checks, fast moves, and attacking king by putting all great pieces around it, my opponent didnt have time to observe all board during this game or else he would lose on time.

So you're making moves and hoping your opponent doesn't see the obvious defenses?  That's like attacking somebody's queen and hoping they won't see it.

why did you post this game?  to show it off?

 I never post a game to show off. I posts games for myself to study them. Although I posted like 2 perfect games and in which one GM was beaten. That game people say has some nice finese. I didnt know my game was like Emanuel Lasker until I bought a book and say his qualities. I never knew who Emanuel Lasker was before but now I know Emanuel Lasker and style more than anyone. Books and Computer program on Lasker helps me. Plus I have over 650 games of Lasker to watch live on the computer program.

win over Capablanca and Steinz was hot

 Lol...the troll lives on!

 Next summer when i get on top of my game I will register for the FIDE and then destroy all 1500 players under 20 moves.

then compete in 2000 rated games in FIDE which is tougher and hopefully get to 2100 so i can challenge GM in blitz chess and use some pyschology to beat them. Of course I would need to pay extra for an FIDE offical to make sure all moves are accurate as well as a witness.

Believe it or not CHESS.com has some nice live tournaments in your area in which you can search and find. Lots of tournaments in NY because NY in manhattan has the strongest chess clubs in the world. FISCHER and BYRNE were well known at these clubs. Kasparov and Karpov also paid a visit to compete at these clubs as well.

Sigh...they can put a man on the moon and we still can't construct plausible lies on the internet.

seems like a pretty pedestrian game with mistakes.  not sure posting it does much for anyone and i didn't notice your asking for analysis.  just saw a game with nothing of note.  we all win and lose games all the time.  thanks for pointing out one of yours, but it seems pointless to me.

God you suck. You can't even spell finesse right, probably because you have none. Wait, where's RainbowRising? This is his job.

13. Rh4 was a mistake, I feel. It looks like an obvious attempt to start an attack on h7 that should never be allowed to occur. The rook is placed pretty well where it is. You are fine, however, when your opponent follows up with the very odd 13. ... Nd7?

14. Rh3? Really, what does this accomplish? It's like you are determined to give black the initiative with pointless moves. Bg5 was much better.

18. Nxf7!? is a nice sack in that it gives you a draw (as Rybka points out) after 18. ... Qxd4 19. Nh6+ Kh8 20. Nf7+ Kg8 21. Nf7+ Kh8 22. Nf7+ Kg8 0-0. If black instead plays 18. ... Kxf7, white can get equality after some nice checks. It's an interesting position.

19. ... Nf6? What was he thinking? It gives up a pawn.

20. ... Qxd4?? Gets his pawn back at the expense of his bishop! You missed 21. Bh6! Black cannot defend with his rook because he needs to defend his a1 rook.

21. ... Qe5? Is literally BEGGING you to win black's bishop. Your check still leaves you in a winning position, though.

23. Rhxg7??? MATE IN ONE. This is a novice mistake. I don't suppose when you play GMs you expect them to kindly ignore the glaring baseline mate to let you crush their king? After g4 you are winning.

23. ... Qxg5?? MISSES A MATE IN ONE. These mistakes are so horrendous they deserve separate paragraphs.

24. h3? I think you have forgotten what the objective of chess is. This only earns one question mark, though, because you still have a forced mate, albeit a slower one. maybe you realized how narrowly you escaped death, and decided not to let it happen again.

24. ... Qc1+? Black is probably crying because he realized he missed mate. Technically a bad move because it hastens his demise.

25. Qxb2? Again, black is pleading with you to end his suffering.

25.-28. are embarassing. You continue to miss your forced mate (in six) and let black trade away the queens so that he actually has a chance for a draw. Well, not much of a chance, seeing as he can't really stop your a and c pawns, but considering you consistently refused to checkmate him, maybe he could try.

But then . . .

You TOLD your opponent to resign? Are you so uncertain of your ability to finish the game that you have to resort to intimidation? In chess, some players will resign, and some will fight it out to the end. I see no reason you can't practice your mating by giving him a proper ending--you clearly could use the practice.

Eebster I agree this was not one of my great games I have played against some GM's but it was not that bad. GM's are easier to play against in a blitz game because they think to much which gives me a huge time advantage in opening and middle game. Then GM's get nervous because of time and dont calculate as efficent because they dont have no time to calculate each possible move.

On the other hand i get nervous playing 1400-1900 players in blitz games because they move just as fast and sometimes faster than me making not the best moves but good moves and mating threats.

Also some chess psychology learned from Emanuel Lasker was that he would load attacking pieces on opponents king so opponents majority of thinking goes to defending king as priority then thinks attacking second. Therefore, in a timed game mating threats would be so hard to find especially when you are under pressure.

Eebster I do appreciate your comments as well as  your insults to my game and style of play : )  I do agree this game does not deserve a post but I posted it due to some great sneaky middle game play.

Oh this twat is back. We all thought you had departed. Shame. Need I remind all the new viewers of all your imaginary games which you posted earlier?

Which imaginary friend did you beat this time?

I knew he'd show up! Yay!

 Sorry mosqutip, I am a ittle confused by your message. From the quotation that you highlighted and commented on, where is the word finesse that demetrios18 couldn't spell?