8252 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Stendido
shuttlechess92
first off, your queen made several questionable trips to g7, without achieving anything. I was confused by 3.cxd5 as it does not follow the queen's gambit lines. however, you did manage to push the queen while developing pieces- a major plus.
6.f3 is a bit dubious, though- what does it achieve? 6. nf3 seems more logical, as it develops yet another piece.
9.Be3 is also confusing to me. it blocks the e pawn from promotion, which also blocks the king's bishop from development. perhaps 9. nf3 then 10. e4 would have been stronger.
however, it was a nice game, especially playing a higher rated player. instead of 21 n e5, which only loses a pawn, n h4 could have been more true to your playing style.
TwoMove
3cxd5 is a good move, 2...Nf6 Marshal defence is a dubious line. The higher rated player's opening play wasn't very impressive really. Think could have a big advantage with 6.Nf3 followed by e4.
In final position, think black's ok after 21...NxN 22BxN BXB 23 QxB Nc4. If instead 21.Nh4 I thought 21... Qxa2 caused some problems,i.e 22.NxB Qa1ch 23 Kc2 Qa2ch 24Kd3 Nc5ch. However,white has 21BxN RXB 22Qd6ch. So maybe 21Nh4 is a good move.
NM OmarCayenne
Looks like 16 g4 would've won a piece (16... Qxg4 17 Bh3).
shuttlechess92 wrote: first off, your queen made several questionable trips to g7, without achieving anything. I was confused by 3.cxd5 as it does not follow the queen's gambit lines. however, you did manage to push the queen while developing pieces- a major plus. 6.f3 is a bit dubious, though- what does it achieve? 6. nf3 seems more logical, as it develops yet another piece. 9.Be3 is also confusing to me. it blocks the e pawn from promotion, which also blocks the king's bishop from development. perhaps 9. nf3 then 10. e4 would have been stronger. however, it was a nice game, especially playing a higher rated player. instead of 21 n e5, which only loses a pawn, n h4 could have been more true to your playing style.
3.cxd5 was meant for him to eat with his knight and I could do e4 taking the center or bringing his queen out early and letting me develop for free.
6.f3 was stupid, my plan back then was to follow it up by g4, now that I see it that would just screw up my king's side.
9.Be3 was meant for me to take the free file, and hopefully castle soon after doubling rook-queen up on it.
Thank you very much for your advice.
5/25/2012 - Reshevsky-Ivanovic, Skopje 1976
by talosian a few minutes ago
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by whatupyodog2 a few minutes ago
Live Game with Commentating!
by adamplenty 4 minutes ago
How can I turn board around?
by KenNielsen 7 minutes ago
Database?
by NachtWulf 7 minutes ago
Easiest opening to learn for beginners ..
by TonyH 9 minutes ago
I finally beat my dad at chess!
by ChiseledChessy 12 minutes ago
Colle or London?
by MuscleRook 15 minutes ago
Wht Bobby Fischer would have beaten Kasparov.
by nameno1had 17 minutes ago
We need more amateurs to post their annotated games.
by learnateverygame 19 minutes ago