I found it very interesting in this blitz game that my opponent was able to pound out his/her moves in a split second during the opening. Afterwards, however, he/she became increasingly slow and made moves that are almost painful to watch.
Evidence that more time should be spent on general strategy than on opening specifics:
I think you're giving black too much, and then unjustly using him as an example of "memorizing not learning". I fail to see how black's opening is a good example of "theory-know-it-all"; With perhaps the exception of 0-0-0, all of black's moves can be logically found. His mistake, while silly, is simply just a mistake, and I'm sure it could happen to many people (especially in blitz.)
I also agree with <therobz> on the matter.
I really don't think anyone, in perfect honesty, can say that they would have played all of the moves for one of the more popular defenses against the Reti without having seen something like this first. Without exaggeration the clock was only down about two seconds for black after the opening. Found through logic, that would simply have to take much longer.
You're missing the point. All of your opponents moves "can" be found quickly, and dude, seriously it was a just a blunder by your opponent. I think you're jumping to conclusion with regards to his learning habits (if he had any at all that is.)
Your opponent could have played the set-up after his 8th move a bazillion times, and thus is able to blaze it out quickly, but that doesn't mean he knows the theory.
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
But how much do you know about the game - the history, the players, the rules, and more!? Take our quiz and compare your scores!
Mark all forum topics as READ