16551 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I enjoyed the way, in Game 1, you harried the queen about until you were able to grab a pawn, then turned that advantage into a win. Well done.
Round 3 move 35 you played Kg2. Couldn't you have just taken the checking bishop on d4?
Yep, and I didn't even realize it until I got home and put it into the computer. When I saw that I felt like a moron. It was a bit of chess blindness, I had mentally given up on the game even though I was still moving pieces around. That's why it's kind of embarassing.
what were the time controls?
don't get dispirited; i was in my first tourny last september and had two tough losses, one lucky win, and one "earned" win. That was before I started this group and I believe Mr. Heisman has changed my game by introducing the correct thought process. I forgot who said, "To become good at chess you must experience many losses" maybe WC GM Alekhine?
Unfortunately a game is not worth the effort of looking at without full names.
why should that matter?
Doesn't, a lot of chess players are arses.
If he doesn't want to reveal his full name he shouldn't have to.
Chess is played between two opponents and their names or handles are a standard part of game information. Without this information it is not a game or contest.
scottrf: You do prove your point in your first sentence by acting out the part.
It will be pretty easy to find the names, especially after the results are published on the USCF site.
Besides some of those people he played might be his friends on here or otherwise and he doesn't want to appear to be bragging. Could be out of respect. Or whatever. Doesn't matter.
That was an awesome first tournament Mr. White! Your provensional rating will be pretty high I imagine once this does post. Start getting prepared to play up in the next Kolty event. :)
Your 3rd round game... been there, done that.
My question is: Why did you play 17. Bf4, instead of taking the free pawn on a6?
yeah, I realized right after I moved that he had left the defense of his bishop. I really wasn't plaing that well that night, and felt I should have won that game. I was pretty dissapointed with that one.
I think I'm going to get around 1700 provisional rating after this, according to my own calculations and what I put into the USCF rating calculator, Which I think is about 150-200 points higher than I should be. This was section 2 which comprises mostly of players in the 1400-1600 rating range. I think I'm going to be moved to section 1 next time since my provisional rating will be close to 1700, so I will probably not do nearly as well.
The game I'm most proud of is the final game. That was a game against a 1594 rated player, and although he may have not been playing his best chess, I feel like I was playing really well that game, and a check on a chess engine confirmed I was playing the best move on each of the first several moves after the opening. It wasn't until move 17 that the computer said Nf8 wasn't the best move.
I think I'm going to get around 1700 provisional rating after this, according to my own calculations and what I put into the USCF rating calculator, Which I think is about 150-200 points higher than I should be.
You shouldn't think like that. This is a provisional rating, why not try to confirm it ? Congratulations on your first OTB tourney !
Good point Hicenuc, I've allways been a bit of a pessimist. :)
Agreed! You were very easily playing at a 1700 rating.
check out my game against Antonio Rabadan (played him) and beat him with a nice checkmate.
also, I can message you my game against Michael Lico if you want :D I beat him, I live near you but I don't attend any chess clubs.
Conservative vs. progressive chess societies
by Timothy_P a few minutes ago
Email log in
by Damon a few minutes ago
12/6/2013 - Mate in 8
by Fang278 4 minutes ago
CONTEST: Caption this Image of Anand & Carlsen
by goldendog 7 minutes ago
help with the scilian
by Scottrf 7 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by Jaglavak 13 minutes ago
Chess By Post
by ilgambittoo 14 minutes ago
Is Aagard's Grandmaster Preparation: Calculation good?
by chessmicky 15 minutes ago
why e4 is better than d4.
by Chessman265 15 minutes ago
0-2224 in less than three years
by AlCzervik 18 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!