For the records, here is game 1: Link
Now the challenge for me was playing black against the computer, while annotating manually each move. I know I have very little practice with playing black. It get's me a little nervous since I like to have the initiative.
This game has a lot more blunders than the other, but for my surprise, the computer made a lot more mistakes than in the previous game. My lack of concentration here is notorious, I took more time to play and made many mistakes annotating. I think that the lesson after this is that I need more practice and many many more games!
But have fun watching this, and don't hesitate to comment on it!
There is a mistake in my analysis of move 22... Nf4
It is Rg6+ Kh1, Qxc5 gxf4 and white is in trouble but not so much trouble as I thought.
Hey, thanks! That is a valuable comment! You are right about the triple pawns, I will have to take that into consideration on my future games.
Then I don't understand Nf5!, do you mean Ne7 to f5? And taking away the two bishops would be only after black's blunder b3? Or is there another way?
or not... lol i just realized if he blocks with the rook thers no checkmate...
:) Complicated game, isn't it? Or is it ourselves?
hehe
An easy checkmate is better than a rook.
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
But how much do you know about the game - the history, the players, the rules, and more!? Take our quiz and compare your scores!
Mark all forum topics as READ