Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

help me analyze

Jump to forum:
 
30th August 2008, 06:32pm
#1
by MasenkoWarrior
Wisconsin United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 88

I know I made mistakes in the endgame. Endgame isn't really my strong suit, but I need help with what exactly I should have done different.

30th August 2008, 07:12pm
#2
by killer-2
Edmonton Canada
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 1913

y not resign sooner?

u will lose anywayafter 70th move

30th August 2008, 07:27pm
#3
by Escapest_Pawn
MISSOULA,MT United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1004

Although players play differently and I am not going to get "preachy", I think the real move you missed was 32 e4.  You cannot permit 2 advanced connected and supported passed pawns.  Rooks are lousy at stopping them even if unsupported.  Assume 32...Qxe4 33 Qxc5 and I think you can do OK. 

30th August 2008, 07:30pm
#4
by MasenkoWarrior
Wisconsin United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 88

killer-2 wrote:

y not resign sooner?

u will lose anywayafter 70th move


hey, there was a chance of getting a stalemate. It's happened before. Besides it's good endgame practice for the guy.

30th August 2008, 07:32pm
#5
by mercytononeZ
New Orleans,LA United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1946

long game.i agree wit killer-2

30th August 2008, 07:34pm
#6
by MasenkoWarrior
Wisconsin United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 88

Escapest_Pawn wrote:

Although players play differently and I am not going to get "preachy", I think the real move you missed was 32 e4.  You cannot permit 2 advanced connected and supported passed pawns.  Rooks are lousy at stopping them even if unsupported.  Assume 32...Qxe4 33 Qxc5 and I think you can do OK. 


thanks. I think you're right.

30th August 2008, 09:04pm
#7
by Tipped
East Coast United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 36

I think you could have had it at

35. Ra6+

The king would have been forced up a rank that was attackable by your queen; and in a few moves; you should have been able to get your king to a defendable position, atleast one that will last the required time to get checkmate. I played some variations out here. Check the move list.

 

A. No; I didn't go over all the variations

B. I already know my variations are incorrect in some ways; I just can't see why. :/

C. I included a short analysis of Escapest_Pawn's idea; and it is strong; but I like mine better :P

31st August 2008, 12:20am
#8
by demonix
Slovenia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 173

Both players here do a lot of mistakes. Black gets more  blunders in opening, you in middlegame and ending.After 7. BXh8 you give you oponent free pices two knights. Two knights = rook, two bishop are much stronger.

5.. Nh5 first black blunder (don't move your pice twice in opening)
6.. Nd7 second blunder you have rok for free
9Ng5+ you give him a knight for free I don't see the win after this move better was 9 g4 and 9.. Ng7 only move then 10 Bxg7 Bxg7 after that white plan is simple castle long and pawn atak on the kingside.
18. 0-0 you should play Nc3 you give him second knight for free.

 

In this position you have 4 powns up and your opponent give you bishop. With carefull play you should win that. But with his best move Qh6 you have little adventage. Two bishop are stronger then rook and two powns you have 4 extra powns.

 

 

 

33 move you should play Qg7+ Kb6 34 Qxe6+ Kxb5

35Qxb3+ and propablu queesn exchange. After that you have a big chances to win the game. 33Ra3 was passive move.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.