Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Help With End Game - What Should I Do?


  • 21 months ago · Quote · #1

    JayLefler

    My opponent resigned, and I think I could have pulled off a win by advancing my pawns, but could you guys give me an endgame analysis on this? Much appreciated!



  • 21 months ago · Quote · #2

    waffllemaster

    @ your ending comment:
    Well you can first get your king into the area of action and then work to generate two more passed pawns by advancing your two majorities... after you do all that if you're still unsure how to win you can post something about it :p

    And by the way, move 30 by white looks pretty reasonable... bringing the king to the center.  The check is meaningless (the king was headed toward the passed pawn in any case), and he couldn't have defended the pawn anyway.  (well, ok, 30.Rf1 defends, but is both tactically and positionally suicidal).

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #3

    varelse1

    Yes, you should be doing here what you should be doing in every endgame you will ever play. Centralize your king!!

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #4

    Yereslov

    I managed to find the winning idea. It involves sacrificing the rook:



  • 21 months ago · Quote · #5

    Yereslov

    By allowing the knight capture your passed pawn becomes unstoppable. 

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #6

    JayLefler

    Yereslov, unfortunately your board isn't showing up for me :-(

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #7

    Yereslov

    Instead of worrying about the rook, take the bishop. Let him take your knight.

    After he takes the rook, play Bd5, and then follow it up with c2. He will be forced to sacrifice his rook, since the knight can't make it in time. 

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #8

    Yereslov

    It looks absurd, but there is nothing he can do to save the game.

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #9

    AndyClifton

    waffllemaster wrote:

    (well, ok, 30.Rf1 defends, but is both tactically and positionally suicidal).

    30... Rxf2 wins (or are you implying that with the "tactically" remark?).

    32... Be3 would win.

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #10

    waffllemaster

    AndyClifton wrote:
    waffllemaster wrote:

    (well, ok, 30.Rf1 defends, but is both tactically and positionally suicidal).

    30... Rxf2 wins (or are you implying that with the "tactically" remark?).

    32... Be3 would win.

    Yep :)

    edit:
    (Oh I see your point, you lose the pawn anyway lol).


Back to Top

Post your reply: