This is the revised version of the early post.

very nice

zlhflans wrote:

very nice

thanks for the comment...it really took me enough time just to put the analysis on every moves of the game.

You shouldn't put analysis on every single move. It may be of some instruction to someone just beginning, but annotating only the unobvious tactics or strategical concepts is more common.

That being said, very good game for white.

dwaxe wrote:

You shouldn't put analysis on every single move. It may be of some instruction to someone just beginning, but annotating only the unobvious tactics or strategical concepts is more common.

That being said, very good game for white.

Actually, someone asked me to put the analysis on every move of the game because he doesn't understand the game or how did I make my moves on the game. Anyway, thank you for the comment.

Dr_Doc_MD wrote:

The one move I actually analzyed was move 6 on black's side. =P

Why not 6... Qb4+!

That move attacks both Knights (d4 knight is attacked twice whilst the a4 knight is attacked once, and the king has to be defended. Therefore, white would lose 1 knight somehow... Correct me if I'm wrong, please!!!

You have an idea but I will not lose any of my knights if black move Qb4+ because of c3 which block the Queen's check and support my knight by my pawn on c3 and by my queen. c3 also opens a diagonal which I could use to support also mu knight on  a4. Thank you for the analysis and comment.

Think black got his theory mixed up, 6...Qa5ch 7c3 is the main-line of this fairly rare line. People like Short dappled with it, white ends up winning the two bishops, but black's position is playable.

I looked at this game a few days ago, and now I think the title of the post should be:

"How to maintain initiative and a lead in development when your opponent puts up a weak fight."

TwoMove wrote:

Think black got his theory mixed up, 6...Qa5ch 7c3 is the main-line of this fairly rare line. People like Short dappled with it, white ends up winning the two bishops, but black's position is playable.

Actually your right about it but since my opponent did'nt think of the best move he lost the game.

anaxagoras wrote:

I looked at this game a few days ago, and now I think the title of the post should be:

"How to maintain initiative and a lead in development when your opponent puts up a weak fight."

hehe...your right about it but I don't want to insult my opponent and I want to pay respect to him.

nice game

niaz wrote:

nice game

thanks for the comment.