15914 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Okay. I played this 960 game a while back. I just started playing it. so my rating is provisional and probably lower than it should be.
But my oppenent was so impressed with the game that he awarded me a trophy for 'strikingly strong play'.
So my questions are:
Was my play up to the piece-sacrifice okay?
Was the piece-sacrifice correct. And could I have played better just after?
And last. Could I have won the endgame we arrived at?
In short. Did I deserve the trophy? Or did my oponent just see a lowrated player play well? :P
P.S. I have to show the game in three stages because I couldn't castle 960 style in the analyzer.
Hmm. the boards are not showing? can anyone help?
Edit: Hmm. As long as I can't make them show properly you can just copy the brackets and paste them in a reply. While you are still in the editor you should be able to see my anotations.. but it must be posible to make it show properly? How do I do that?
edit2: found it :)
its this one:
or this one?
Neither. It's this one http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=55780228.
lol ... i was supposing you won the game so i avoided the only one you drew.
Well. I am asking if I could have won :P so I sort of already implied that I didn't win ;)
yep .. correct. :-P
Gave a quick look but honestly i dont feel good enough to tell you if you could win, but i see why he wanted to award you the trophey. At some point he had huge matherial advantage ( a lot of pawn more and just 1 rock each), but in the endgame you came to equality. Thats a good achievement imho.
Ah.. I don't recocnize your scenario? I played black.. and I was trying to win the rook-endgame a pawn up.
Before that I was behind by a piece for a pawn, since I sacked a knight to liberate my posistion.
ops.. sorry! you was black.
Im probably a worse player than you but honestly looking at the position after move 36 i would have said that the match was won by black.
that said, find a way to win its not easy and if you dindt made it then for sure i wouldn't too.
Mmm. I thought I was winning too. Which is why I would like to see some strong advice on how to improve my play in that endgame.
Demidjinn, your opponent gave you a trophy so he (or she) obviously thought you deserved it. I'd say that's what matters.
Good for you. Others are sore lossers.
Well.. he didn't loose. That's one of the points.
Is there nobody that would like to look at that endgame and comment on what other plans might, or might not, have led to a win? :) that's actually the main reason I am even posting here.
I would also, actually, like to know how a stronger player would rate the game (hence the title). Get some feedback. To improve. That's the point.
It matters to me if I actually did or didn't play a strong game.
Look people.. If you don't have constructive analysis' and/or comments then please don't post. I am not trying to show of here. I am trying to get an evaluation of my game. With constructive critique.
8/28/2015 - Back Problems, Ouch!
by Laki_97 a few minutes ago
When non-chess players sell chess equipment -FAIL-
by tmkroll a few minutes ago
How far will Carlsen slide?
by petrosianpupil 5 minutes ago
how many ways can you die while playing chess?
by thechessplaya5 6 minutes ago
Studying openings is highly UNDERrated!
by Eseles 6 minutes ago
by DjonniDerevnja 7 minutes ago
Refuting the Dragon
by 2000mushroom 12 minutes ago
Who Is The Best Players In Chess History
by Senior-Lazarus_Long 12 minutes ago
Anyone collect Zagreb style chess sets
by 9kick9 20 minutes ago
6/22/2015 - Mate in 3
by hoglahoo 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!