^ Click here to remove ads! ^

I won a game without moving my king at all. :)

Jump to forum:
 
5th June 2008, 10:24pm
#1
by einstein_69101
Lincoln, Nebraska United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 2208

In this game I made 24 moves without moving my king.  The center was closed so my king was not in too much danger.  :)  However there was a chance that my king was going to move soon but my opponent resigned.  :)

Maybe the question is how long can you play without moving your king and win?  :)


5th June 2008, 10:32pm
#2
by tbierig
St. Paul, Minnesota United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 342
Too many smileys.  Some of us aren't happy people. Frown
6th June 2008, 04:15am
#3
by ThreeQueens
Durham, North Carolina United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1274
Evidently Einstein likes his life.  SmileLaughingCool  That's a good reason for lots of smileys.  Thanks, Einstein.
6th June 2008, 05:22am
#4
by EnGliSHCheSsPlAy
Italy Italy
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 317

You played 1.c4.. it was a positional game.. but if you had played 1.e4 it would have been another game and your king would have been, in many cases, in danger.. however it was a good game


6th June 2008, 05:32am
#5
by etarnal
singapore Singapore
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 181
why resign? a knight for a pawn isnt that bad....
6th June 2008, 06:22am
#6
by jcoby
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 8
As a matter of fact, Einstein, I think you were playing a losing game. Although black loses the knight, his two rooks are already in action and you were soon going to be bombarded in the center. Resigning was not the right option! :)
6th June 2008, 06:47am
#7
by RELee1863
Raleigh United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 271
Einstein does castling count???
6th June 2008, 06:59am
#8
by thepitbull
Baltimore United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 49

White's last move was supposed to do what it actually did, intimidate his opponent.  The best thing for white to do afterwards is to march the kingside pawns, starting with h5, irregardless of what the trapped knight does.  From this I could possibly see a promising attack on that wing.  White cannot afford to open the e-file at all. And he's not in a position to do so.  The move was more psychological than rational.  The black knight is trapped, but what would be the response should black move the knight anywhere? 

This is simply a game where white played the man rather than the board. I think that what Lasker had said at one point.  Fischer said to play the board, not the man.  So, this game is different from what most would expect nowadays.


6th June 2008, 07:06am
#9
by colle-pirc
purcellville United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 321

yeah i went back and thought "i should have made the knight sac, it would have at least been fun"

 

too bad! 


6th June 2008, 04:48pm
#10
by jreyes33
Quito Ecuador
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 50
He shouldn't have resigned. I think
7th June 2008, 02:42pm
#11
by jreyes33
Quito Ecuador
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 50
He shouldn't have resigned. I think
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.