Maybe the question is how long can you play without moving your king and win? :)
You played 1.c4.. it was a positional game.. but if you had played 1.e4 it would have been another game and your king would have been, in many cases, in danger.. however it was a good game
White's last move was supposed to do what it actually did, intimidate his opponent. The best thing for white to do afterwards is to march the kingside pawns, starting with h5, irregardless of what the trapped knight does. From this I could possibly see a promising attack on that wing. White cannot afford to open the e-file at all. And he's not in a position to do so. The move was more psychological than rational. The black knight is trapped, but what would be the response should black move the knight anywhere?
This is simply a game where white played the man rather than the board. I think that what Lasker had said at one point. Fischer said to play the board, not the man. So, this game is different from what most would expect nowadays.
yeah i went back and thought "i should have made the knight sac, it would have at least been fun"
too bad!
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
But how much do you know about the game - the history, the players, the rules, and more!? Take our quiz and compare your scores!
Mark all forum topics as READ