15679 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
What was the point behind 12.c4?
Trying to create space, didnt analyze at all....
9.Qe2 looks really good looking back now
If you think about it, 12... c4 and 12...d5 actually give up space, in a way of thinking.
I think not taking control of the b-file with a rook was a big opportunity missed by both players
I don't honestly know what that question is intended to convey. But if you're asking me if White is considerably better, then I think the answer is yes.
#8. bishop freebe would make white feel light headed....
The whole Ne2-Ng3 thing is just a waste of time. The knight is more effectve on f3 where the piece can support the d4 pawn push. At g3 the knight is useless.
That white bishop u gave away seemed to be your good bishop on queen side. He couldve helped a lot in attacks from that side . Plus , on 13.d5 i guess it shouldve been 13.e3 . plus i think u shouldve taken the b- file with the rook , wouldve given u a bit of strategic advantage to use that channel for attacks. I usually dont move the pawn pieces on kingside until dire necessity and keep the bishop in centre so he can cover more area and hence help in directing my attacks in midgame. Plus the arrangement of pawns in d,e and c file aactually prevents any passage thru it , so the only way is around it. best wouldve been using the knights to bring protection to the pawns and other pieces on kingside and going on attack on the other side using queen and the rook sitting on a1. On 26 I think taking Queen to g5 wouldve resulted in an exchange with his queen and then u couldve got one or even both of your knights active on the kingside and hence would be in better position.
That sums it up accurately
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by kantifields a few minutes ago
7/24/2014 - Mate in 5
by RookPFeynman 5 minutes ago
How do you feel about players who win by cowardly queening a pawn
by Till_98 9 minutes ago
Acceptable or Unacceptable
by knightkrawlirr 10 minutes ago
How good do you have to be to play the Sicilian
by tthechesstitan 11 minutes ago
by tthechesstitan 13 minutes ago
Is being self taught good or bad?
by tthechesstitan 15 minutes ago
The Troll's Analysis Thread
by ForeignTroll 17 minutes ago
i dont understand this GM's thought process...
by mattyf9 28 minutes ago
Poker Chess Magic The Gathering Baccarat
by Till_98 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!