13184 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I sacced a knight and rook in this game for far superior positioning down the road, would a better player have ripped me for this?
Yes, you would of gotten very severly owned if you had played that against a stronger player.
Can you just elaborate a bit more? For instance, someone pointed out that the move 15: b4 would have nullified my rook sac in this other game.
Yes, a better player would have owned you. As I told someone before, what has black done to deserve to get rocked by your knight sac? He has made reasonable moves. Your sac isn't based on mistakes by black or some opening theory line. You have just one piece involved in the attack initially which is clearly not enough and black has few weaknesses. He has doubled g-pawns but has compensation in the open h-file. You are simply missing too many requirements for a sacrifice like this. You got nada but kudos for winning anways.
I wish i could get someone to play like this against me. It would be so fun to see how White would continue after 7. g4?! Nxg4 8. hxg4 Bxg4 and White can start the car and get ready to go home before seeing how the rest of the game played out.
2.e3 (?) is passive. c4, or Nf3, are the interesting moves (c3 is passive too, even if less because it does not trap a bishop)
3.Bd3 (?) commits to never play c4 because it would lose a tempo after ...dxc4, and choses the place of the bishop (d3 against e2) when it could have been wise to keep the choice for later.
4.b3 is the only way to get out of the move 2 problem, but only if you intend to exchange the bishop on a3, not to place it on a fianchetto your pawn closes on b2.
5.Nf3 (?) : 5.Ne2, with the idea f3 and e4, was a way to get something done.
7.g4 (?) weakens the kingside for no advantadge.
8.Bb2 ? : see comment on 4.b3
9.Bxg6 (?) : the doubled pawn here are not a liabality, but an asset : they are harder to attack and above all they open the h file for Black.
11.Nxf7 ?? throws awyay a piece.
15 "the queens attacks many squares from there" : this is true, but it attacks no useful square. What good is it to attack the d5 pawn if it is solidly defended and no tactical opportunities arise from sacrificing a piece on it ? What good is it to control e4 if pushing the pawn on it only leads to massive trade of material which favors Black who has one more piece ?
15...Ne8 ? is passive and achieves nothing. Black crushes White's head after ...a5, ...a4, etc.
16...Bh4 ?? runs into a trap for nothing.
The exchange sacrifice (you get one minor piece for your rook, so that's not a rook sacrifice) is justified, because White can't take the trapped bishop otherwise.
24...Rxh4 (?) : this wins much time for Black's attack, but it was simpler to play ...Kf7, as anyways White has nothing.
25...c5 ? loses time compared to ...a4 ! where all white moves lead to the opening of a file and a dolourous death.
I agree 26...Nxc5 is better than the text (retaking with the queen)
30...Nb8 ????? achieves nothing. Simply ...Kf7 and White is lost (no counterplay).
31...Qxe3 + ?? loses badly.
So no, the piece sacrifice wasn't appropriate. The exchange sacrifice was.
Oh yes ? And what is your brilliant answer to 9.Be2 in that line ?
"Old School with Uncle Yermo! Host GM Alex Yermolinsky "
by _Jellyfish_ 3 minutes ago
Chess for Oldtimers --- Good Idea !
by motherinlaw 4 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by EulerTheToiler 5 minutes ago
Secrets of a strong troll 2
by TheBlazedAssassin 8 minutes ago
I have nobody blocked...
by tkbunny 9 minutes ago
1/26/2015 - Richard Teichmann vs. NN, Berlin, 1914
by Foe-Hammer 9 minutes ago
Why does Chess.com use a fake testimonial???
by DrCheckevertim 9 minutes ago
Sotftware: HIARCS, Chessbase, Macs etc.
by Chicken_Monster 13 minutes ago
by Sqod 13 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Chess (PPC) - "GIBRALTAR MASTERS OPEN 2015" Edition
by MSC157 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!