11507 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is a game I played yestarday as White. I was wondering if you guys could look at it and give me feedback. Thanks!
Time control: 85 minutes for first 40 moves. 30 minutes sudden death.
17...Qd7 probably with the idea of Qg4.
19.Qxf4 winning a pawn is good but black gets some compensation for it. It's not a clear pawn in my opinion.
23. bxc5, I see no reason to put his knight on such a nice square. Just Nc6 but black will have some counterplay with f5.
25. Nxe5 I'm not sure what is better. Black has real counterplay here. I think the mistake was made earlier.
26. Qh6 agree with your analysis here. I don't know what is better though. Black is better.
30. Qh3, this just loses to Qxh3 and Re3. Black needs to have some technique but you have a ton of weak pawns to attack. Trading down is probably the way to go but not this way. If only you could get a pair of rooks traded, maybe it would make your task easier. And yes, you are probably playing for a draw here.
33...Qb4 black starts giving it all away.
All in all I think you played pretty well and your analysis was pretty reasonable. What hurt was that you weren't able to see all the counterplay black was able to muster versus your e-pawn and then the total domination of the e-file. I think you felt that being up a pawn in that position was worth more than it was. I'm not saying to avoid taking it unless there was something better, but you have work to do once you take it.
How I improved my rating from 1000 to 1500+ in 12 months
by totalnovice12 a few minutes ago
6/29/2015 - Mate in 2
by Sun4Ray 3 minutes ago
Chess Boards and Correspondence Chess
by pawpatrol 4 minutes ago
by friscodelrosario 5 minutes ago
Chess.com users should be REQUIRED to use REAL NAMES.
by Bronco 12 minutes ago
6/18/2015 - Paul Keres vs. Verbak, corres, 1932
by turkhuu_5 16 minutes ago
Some uneducated moderator has removed my content
by kleelof 16 minutes ago
6/27/2015 - M.Tal - R.Dzidzichashvili, 1991
by bluebird21 16 minutes ago
Beating a grandmaster or an international master...
by ChessOptimist 18 minutes ago
Why Not 2. NC3??
by Fiveofswords 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!