15640 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So, I recently played the game with an amateure opponent (playing black). I'm only about intermediate level, but am looking to improve. So, I analysed this game to the best of my ability, and am interested in other people's thoughts.
I don't see any picture of a score-sheet, game diagram, or manually written game notation. I'd look over the game for you if you can do one of those.
For some reason the board didn't post so I'll try again.
Hi Kieth!Ok. Mistakes as I see them.First, when someone opens with king pawn, if you return pawn c7 to c5 that will give you more strength in the middle. You want your pawns in the middle and if you attack from the sides towards the middle (like using the bishop pawn) you can better accomplish this.Second, when he dropped the bishop to b5, you should attack. Move knight c6 to d4. That way you threaten the bishop and his knight and he will have to take your knight with his. Then you advance your pawn up a space into his territory and you can secure it easily.Ok. . . I have just seen you take his king pawn with your queen. I have NOT seen what he does next but you have just given up your queen because your queen and your king are lined up and all he has to do it move his castle over and you lose the queen. Let's see if I'm right.Yep.NEVER line up your queen and your king without paying attention to bishops and castles.
From there it was all down hill
Try playing your own rating or above, though the game should serve as a lesson to him, and you are the instructive higher rated player in this game. He didn't see Qxe4 being a blunder because he didn't go over his checks, captures, and threats.
Ratings Are Deceiving
by Zigwurst a few minutes ago
YOU TUBE CHANEL Poverty in America:
by brigatine-66 a few minutes ago
7/23/2014 - Kasparov - Vilaisarn (simul) 2008
by legolas-greenleaf 4 minutes ago
Complaint about my comments on Tactical Trainer
by Annabella1 6 minutes ago
Vishy Anand claims to be able to see 70 moves ahead...
by alexm2310 6 minutes ago
How good do you have to be to play the Sicilian
by Here_Is_Plenty 7 minutes ago
I'm banned from posting notes on another person's page?
by _Jellyfish_ 11 minutes ago
Bumping Old Threads
by Here_Is_Plenty 12 minutes ago
by MuchDutch 14 minutes ago
Why Doesn't Chess.com Stop All The Nonsense?
by RonaldJosephCote 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!