11107 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Below is my first long game and I lost horribly against a FM. I hope that some stronger players would be willing to give me valuable advices so that I will be able to improve.
(My strength is about 1800)
In fact, I hope for some concrete suggestions and annotations on the moves I played.
Just a few thoughts, as I am at work and ... supposed to actually work:
- Losing the B-pair in the opening due to a tactic gave white a stable +=. I'm not sure what theory recomments but my guess is that 7...Bg4 isn't very good.
- 14...f6 weakened your light squares, and in the end that weakening proved fatal. Your opponent forced h6, opened the file and executed your king. Here is where I would look hard for an improvement. Maybe even a crazy move like 14...b5, to secure square c4 for your knight and possibly prepare later Q-side counterplay.
Thanks for your comments, which are obviously much better and more useful than those given by a player who tries to insult others without making any contribution.
Dude why so serious ? im fide 2169 i know a player with 1800 fide would never i mean never every play moves that you played in game it is weak but you should improve
'Every move is weak' What a nice joke it is. I have 2 wins, 3 draws and no losses against players rated between 1700 and 1900, which I think is not something that a 1400 player would achieve. Of course I understand that I didn't play this game well, otherwise I would not have to face such pressure after about 28 moves, but I am not interested in replying to such insults. I will not reply to any of your future comments, unless you are actually giving useful and reasonable advices with evidence. I don't know if you enjoy insulting others, but you will never upset me with such methods.
Ignore the troll. It's hard to play against strong opponents, and the white player in this game certainly is one, with Elo 2313 most probably underrated, as it's from a U16 event. They are good at making you look weak. I've had my own share of thrashings from guys like Tiviakov or Georgiev, which hardly looked any better than your game.
Thank you. And I am really glad and grateful that some strong players like you are willing to give advices and suggestions to weaker players.
Hard to actually add anything more. However I think that Qc8 was a pretty bad move. Other than that I thought you should have started some play on the QS yourself than defend passively.
A pretty fair game as you made only a few mistakes.
I agree with everything Sagitittyus has said.
Just ignore Sagittyus, apparently he has to drag others down to feel better about himself. When you are playing really strong players (like Jeffery), they can many times make you look like an absolute beginner. Still, you put up a good fight and avoided some tricky tactics of his. It's absolutely ridiculous to say you are 1300-1400, and I don't think your estimate of 1800 is far off.
well not that i have worked deeply in russian defence but my theory suggests 7. ... 0-0.
i have never played it so i'm not so sure about it.
Then the follow up i have for black is: 8. Qd2 Nd7! 9.0-0-0 Re8 10. h4! c6 11. h5 h6
that is the only help i can give you
hope i helped :)
Nice game too he looks like a talent since he is only 14. good work
You did great! You still have plenty of potential since you qualified for the U16. I have fed 1.e4,e5 2.Nf3,Nf6 3.Nxe5,d6 4.Nf3 to an opening survey:
"White wins: 10390 (=38%), Draws: 11021 (=40%), Black wins: 5892 (=22%)The drawing quote is higher than average. (14% quick draws, < 20 Moves)"
Compared to 1.e4,e5 2.Nf3,Nc6 3.Bb5:
"White wins: 92250 (=41%), Draws: 71751 (=32%), Black wins: 60356 (=27%)The drawing quote is lower than average. (7% quick draws, < 20 Moves)"
So black has a 5% higher win rate from here whereas white's win rate is only 3% higher than in the Petroff. The caveat is the need for lots of theory. There are some basic plans, ideas, and traps you should be aware of, not just here but in the Scotch, Italian, and King's Gambit too.
These are typically more imbalanced than the Petroff, which is notorious for having similar pawn structures and piece distributions.
22...Bc5 with the idea of 23...Nd6 looks viable, as the knight threatens the lightsquared bishop and watches over f5. That is white's star attacking minor piece as it watches over the vulnerable h7 point and works with the pawn steamroller. 24.h6! doesn't look comfortable at first sight, but you have the defense 24...fxg5! 25.hxg7,Qxh5 26.Qh5,Re6 27.fxg5,Ne4 and you're frusterating his attack. 24...f5 looks solid and worth calculating: 25.hxg7,Qxg7 and the pawns get in the bishops' (notice where the apostrophe is, his own pawns and your f-pawn obstruct them both) way. Just watch out for a major piece on the g-file preparing a g6 push. 26.Qg3?!,Ne4! doesn't immediately work for him as the knight threatens the queen, blunts the bishop, and covers g6.
22...Bc5 23.g5,Nd6 24.h6,Ne4 is also an obvious candidate since knights are great for obtructing bishops. However, it isn't best if you investigate further: 25.gxf6,gxf6 26.Bxe4,dxe4 27.Qg3+,Kh8! and white forced some big concessions out of black. You'd still be in the game, but 24...f5! is equal whereas 24...Ne4 leads to a clear advantage for white.
He missed 23.g5!,fxg5 24.fxg5,Ne5 with a clear advantage and uncomfortable defensive task ahead for black, and 23.Qh3 was acceptable but seems like what Heisman calls overpreparing.
Jealous of what ? Of having a title and giving relevant comments (for free) while you do not ?
I gave him a free tip " You played weak you should improve" That was better than all of those jobless comments.
You mean, the comments that actually told him stuff about the game ?
Let me give you a secret : never die. Here you go, immortality for free.
9/17/2014 - GM Abhijeet Gupta - IM Roeland Pruijssers, Corus C
by Hogan9600 a few minutes ago
program cheating or a glitch
by newstyle1001 5 minutes ago
Chess Set Value
by Crappov 10 minutes ago
This guy thinks I am cheating
by SJP_chesskid 11 minutes ago
Chess Engine Help
by Crappov 12 minutes ago
Is 8 hours of chess enough for a 4 year old future world champion?
by Pulpofeira 28 minutes ago
9/10/2014 - GM Tiger Persson - GM Oleg Romanishin, Corus C, 20
by Newba 38 minutes ago
9/11/2014 - Mate in 6
by Newba 39 minutes ago
9/12/2014 - IBM Challenger 9 (C) vs Alexei Suetin, Moscow, 198
by Newba 41 minutes ago
9/13/2014 - Gadia - Mendes, Sao Paulo 1967
by Newba 42 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!