12763 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Pretty much went off to college, hadn't played a rated game of chess in 3 months, no theory studying so i forgot it all. I decided to play a rated game at my club, going into it with the attitude that I would just play the best moves i could find and stay away from super theory. Also I listened to music the entire time so I could keep myself from being bored. Here it is.
You played well but it seems your opponent wasn't up to his usual level of play.
Move 12 or 13 is probably necessary as much as I'd just like to 12.0-0
But taken together this is definitely a mistake.
Then after abandoning the center he follows up with 15.a4? I think you're completely winning at that point. It would have been a disaster to be held to a draw (not that I haven't blow nice positions before!) but you won, good job.
Your opponent was definitely having an off night. It looked like he was trying to play away from theory as well, maybe expecting an easy game, and put himself in a position he just didn't understand at all.
I do agree, he said he used to know some theory on it, but didn't remember it from 20 years ago.
White was passive. I play 1d5 2Nc3 and can get strong attack. Simply there is plan with O-O-O and trading darksquared Bishop for your Bishop on g7 (simply Qd2 and Bh6 at some moment). Other good move for White is to play Bd3 supporting later on e4. White had no plan. He could not find any weaknes in Black position, so he did not know what to do. If i were Black, i'd tried to launch all-out attack after ...f6 playing h4 and g4 and so on.
The worst thing i saw in game, was for White to give up Center (trades of pawns). He did it volunteerly, which is mystery, how come 2000+ could do that - maybe he saw himself loosing in every continuation, still...
White was playing the Barry attack for those that are wondering. He flubbed it up with 7.Ne5, which is too early in that position. Better instead is 7.h4 (part of the theme of the Barry attack) and let black commit to Nbd7 before following up with Ne5. Also possible is the more restrained and positional 7.h3 followed by 0-0, but this doesn't adhere to the spirit of the Barry attack.
By the way, the official names of the players:
Marvin Shumowitz (1999) versus Max S. Ward (1805)
Event: League 19-20
Site: Branchburg, New Jersey
Time Control: G/60 + 10
Marvin had been very close to NM level in rating many years ago. It would seem he's lost some of his strength of play over time.
Please be relevant, helpful & nice!
Exactly, but the main thing was that I think i didn't settle for the easy move, but kept looking for the better one.
Chessbazaar's Dubrovnik 4" crimson problem?
by JackieMatra 3 minutes ago
OTB Tournament Preparation
by awesomechess1729 6 minutes ago
A Unigue Smothered Mate
by HessianWarrior 8 minutes ago
I analyse your games in live chess (free)
by MuhammadAreez10 8 minutes ago
Chess openings that suit tactical players fancy?
by ChessConure 12 minutes ago
by Oraoradeki 31 minutes ago
by ipcress12 34 minutes ago
Question for 2000+ level players
by chessweb101 39 minutes ago
Chess collectors international
by smc5910 42 minutes ago
by g-man15 45 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!