15894 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
questions are in the annotations
8...Be7 is passive and hardly does anything. Bc5 attacks the f-pawn and offers control in the center.
Best guess for why the analysis prefers 10...Qxc4 is the central control. The bishop is also still under attack by your bishop, and it would be a developing move.
11. Point-wise, the rook is 5 and your knight and bishop totals 6. Qf5 protects the knight, and stops the 2 for 1 trade.
Thank you! I didn't realize that the queen was also attacking my knight. Makes sense now.
Hello Yes_Chess. I would like to answer one of your question "Qh6?? How is this a blunder??" It is not a blunder. So you play 11..Qh6 then 12.Rxg4 BxR 13 QxR black is still ahead. After 11..Qf5 black is better because the exchange mentioned above is not possible for white. Cheers.
Like sunshiny said about Be7.
10.Qxc4 is better, because you maintain not just a pawn, but a very important central pawn which restrics alot of whites play, as you noticed your idea of Kingside attack is actually alot stronger if you maintain this pawn, whithout it white has an easier time defending as he can get his pieces to the right squares.
Qh6 I would call a blunder since it loses two pieces for a rook after Rxg4, leaving you up only an exhange without much other positional advantages
No - after this line White has a pawn for an exchange and Black no attack left, which is way better than (after 11...Qf5) having one less piece and being under the storm.
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
by TheRocketKing a few minutes ago
by Ziggyblitz a few minutes ago
Ur chess personality
by Daimonion 5 minutes ago
8/30/2014 - Nimzowitsch - Marshall
by healthybrick 6 minutes ago
Siclian Dragon Question
by BT90210 13 minutes ago
How to Respond to Crazy Pawn Pushers?
by With_every_step 18 minutes ago
Artur Yusupov's Nine Books
by tucumcari 28 minutes ago
World Chess.com Correspondence Chess Championship Match (MSC157 vs. _)
by Aetheldred 31 minutes ago
House of Staunton "Classic 3.75"
by Crappov 35 minutes ago
by JackHogg 42 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!