16405 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Since when I came back to Ruy Lopez I'm playing better! I just played this game. It wasn't very tough to win but I think it's remarkable because I don't think I made any mistakes, perhaps a few inaccuracies. The game was 60|0.
8. 0-0 is a better way to protect your pawn. (8...Nxe4? 9. Re1) Then you have a slight advantage due to your lead in development, easy development for the rest of your pieces (Nc3, Bg5, Re1, f3 all suggest themselves) and a long-term kingside majority to push.
The plan to harass black's queenside pawn was good. Particularly aiming at the front c-pawn, that was well seen as black has some problems defending it. Then black just handed you a pawn, another one, and suddenly the game was over. I really can't see improvements for you past around move 20, the moves were all natural and seem winning. Very well played!
Thanks Remellion and very well pointed. 8.0-0 seems better because I avoid that pin and protect the pawn. But I analyzed the game with an engine and curiously enough Nc3 was better for some reason.
The Lasker variation is not "dubious". It is the essence of the Exchange variation, i.e. effective pawn majority vs. pair of bishops. If you do not know how White can win the position at the end of my post, you should not play that. (and you should learn it !). Allowing the doubling of the c pawns was indeed a mistake.
13.Ne2 ? -> Nb3 followed by ...Bg5.
18...Rad8 : c5 is lost, because the only way to defend it is 18...Ne7 and then Re1 and Nd3 force ...Bxd3 cxd3 with a huge edge for White.
White is maybe winning at move 25, but he still has a hard path to walk after 25...c4. c3 is a permanent weakness.
The rest is perfect in my eyes.
Endgame to know :
You're right, Irontiger. It just was the first time I played this variation and I didn't know how to handle it. I usually castle after exchanging on c6 and I played bad in the opening because I didn't even bother to analyze the position. I played very quickly. I usually do so in the opening, especially in a kinda quite one, like this. And that's why sometimes I screw it up.
10/2/2014 - Judit Polgar - Artashes Minasian, Batumi, 1999
by ArthurJoe 6 minutes ago
Why I am not improving?
by Jimmykay 6 minutes ago
Is 1.e4 d5 an "ok" opening
by Here_Is_Plenty 17 minutes ago
by Stephenson2 18 minutes ago
Is this position legal?
by going4grandmaster 19 minutes ago
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
by aww-rats 25 minutes ago
Help with what to do against 1. e5 c5!!!!
by Here_Is_Plenty 27 minutes ago
Legality of pawnless 26 piece positions
by Here_Is_Plenty 29 minutes ago
How to become a Top Blogger?
by Here_Is_Plenty 34 minutes ago
World Chess.com Correspondence Chess Championship Match (MSC157 vs. windmill64)
by MSC157 37 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!