14005 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
My oponent placed too much confidence in drawing opposite color bishops.
Next time it might help if you bothered mentioning a few more minor details, like what color you were playing - instead of letting everyone else having to figure it out on their own. You could have just cut and paste the pgn file into the board editor here, which would have inc all the game details (I usually delete my opponents nm if I won)
He (she) shouldn't have resigned so soon, (as you noted) your 2 connected passed pawns do look imposing but opposite-color Bishops can be very annoying sometimes even vs such imposing odds.
You should submit the game for analysis in addition to doing some of your own.
Your game is actually similar to a game I just went over, Korchnoi-Botvinnik 1960.
To begin, here's a basic drawing method followed by an example of when it doesn't work.
After that is another way you can win with opposite bishops. These are useful to know when looking at the game example of how Korchnoi wins and also in the variation of how he could have won if Botvinnik had improved his defense.
In the above example if we switch the color of the bishops then black cannot prevent the winning move g6. This is the position Botvinnik found himself in during the game. In your game white has the same opportunity / winning plan.But first, the other common way to win is if the pawns are far apart.
Here's how Korchnoi did it (create passed f and g pawns). Notice move 36 threatens to create a passed b pawn so the bishop must abandon its blockade. Botvinnik suggested the variation after the game. Later Korchnoi found a win from the variation. Comments are Korchnoi's.
This is good review for me. I actually never noticed that in certain positions if you switch the color of the opposite bishops the game can go from drawn to completely lost (no matter the formation!)
As long as you keep a pair of major pieces on the board, the opposite color bishop disadvantage is less signifcant. You don't want to trade into a solely endgame of bishops of opposite color unless you have at least have a 2 pawn advantage+ positional advantage, or just an outright dominating positional advantage.
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by AbandonedHeadband a few minutes ago
Happy Women's Day
by Assasinoz a few minutes ago
Why Russia and Eastern European countries have better chess players and women
by shockinn a few minutes ago
Philidor Defense: Is it worth playing as Black?
by MCFan a few minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by Ronald_Aprianto 3 minutes ago
Creating traps vs positional play
by N3l50n 4 minutes ago
A Missed Opportunity of Winning
by kalaro 5 minutes ago
SHOW ME YOUR BONES !
by ROBB_CHESS 4 minutes ago
Analysis mumbo jumbo...
by Ranx0r0x 6 minutes ago
I need your help winning a bet
by EscherehcsE 7 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!