12278 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
As I've said before, in an effort to improve my understanding of chess, I've decided to post a few of my games here for community analysis. This game is a little lazy on my part, since my opening strategy was dubious. However, inaccurate play by my opponent eventually led to victory for me. Please help me :)
looks pretty solid to me
Rather than 27. Rxa6 (letting his Bishop out), I would have preferred Rd1 intending Rdd7. Then centralize your King.
Black has played such inaccuracy on opening such as the move ...c6 which blocks the scope of bishop and also does ignore the principle of development on opening. It played ...d6, ...c6, ...e6 too many pawn moves that the most logical continuation is to castle, put rooks on center, and later attack the center.
White's material advantage does converted in to win.
You should not exchange off queens when you have a space (and central)
advantage. You should be attacking.
Yes, attacker side must ignore exchange because the attack will reduce it's efficiency and sometimes can fail
That makes sense. Thanks for the advice.
Thanks for the advice.
There are several important exceptions to that "Don't exchange while attacking" rule...
If you are up in material, exchanging pieces might lead to a more certain win than continuing your attack.
If most of the opponent's defensive resources rely on one specific piece (eg: his Queen), then an exchange might suddenly leave him helpless against the remaining attackers.
Thanks. I suppose I should judge whether or not the position calls for it. Thanks guys for all the help so far!
Your opponent is a beginner I think.... this game looks really full of mistakes especially with your opponent...
I don't think someone rated 1100 has the right to speak of "beginners"
9/1/2014 - Mate in 2
by baraihan 3 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by EpsilonEridani 4 minutes ago
what is the point of correspondence chess?!??
by rowsweep 4 minutes ago
What will Nakamura's excuse be at Sinquefield 2014?
by rowsweep 17 minutes ago
World Chess.com Correspondence Chess Championship Match (MSC157 vs. _)
by windmill64 17 minutes ago
8/29/2014 - Rada - Kostal, Prague 1942
by LaGr77 33 minutes ago
What happen here?!
by kleelof 51 minutes ago
Mastery of Finishing Touch
by Ronald_Aprianto 59 minutes ago
Sinquefield Cup 2014
by varelse1 67 minutes ago
do you guys think caruana is better then carlsen
by BigChessEnthusiast 72 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!