10574 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I don't know whether 5.Nc3 is best, but I don't like it. The resulting pawn formation is similar to the Spanish exchange with color reversed. The difference is that, in the Spanish exchange, in return for the damaged pawn structure, Black receives a compensation which is the possession of two bishops and open center. In this particular game, White does not receive a similar benefit. So I think 5.Nc3 is inferior.
Tell it to Anand
Top players play all kinds of sub-optimal moves. Their purpose is to avoid the opponent's preparation. Just because Anand plays it, it doesn't mean that the move is the best.
I whole-heartedly agree with you.
To make this a peaceful conversation: 5.d4 and 5.Nc3 both do not lead to a white win, objectively speaking (if both sides play correctly, the game ends in a draw; I guess this is at least the opinion of the majority of GMs).
The question which one of the two moves raises more positional problems for Black is - from this point of view - less important.
On the other hand, even if my impression that 5.d4 is 'better' would be a valid statement , it is perhaps not true from the practical point of view:
The defense tools against 5.d4 have been demonstrated in many games of the leading world players, who play often the Petroff with both colours.
I dare to say this is not true for me.
I meant that I have no fear to play with Black against the plan with Nc3.
The Petroff does appear to mostly be a draw. I had just been studying it, but I forgot about the queenside castling. If I were to castle queenside, the doubled c pawns would be an advantage in the middle game because it would add protection to the king. Also, 3. Nxe5 is main line Petroff, so I'm not sure what that is about.
12/12/2013 - Polugaevsky - Szilayi, Moscow 1960
by MDCCP 3 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by goldendog 4 minutes ago
Can Anyone Become Grandmaster?
by KeatonBrownstead 7 minutes ago
Keep losing on Easy (800)
by MichaelPorcelli 9 minutes ago
Fischer: mentally disturbed or just mean spirited jerk?
by polydiatonic 12 minutes ago
by SsPpIiDdEeRr 13 minutes ago
Unable to upgrade
by ironjesus 18 minutes ago
Why hasn't Ivanov been banned yet?
by Wilbert_78 20 minutes ago
If you could combine two chess pieces powers what would the two pieces be???????
by JoshauMorris 20 minutes ago
Move that cause black to resign but could have played on
by SsPpIiDdEeRr 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!