11213 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
In this very short game (only 14 moves) my opponent resigned after it became apparent that he would lose a knight. I found this a bit strange, so my question is: are there any more advantages that I might have missed, besides winning the knight? My opponent was rated a lot higher, so he might've seen things that I missed.
Being a piece down for nothing is a sufficent reason to resign.
Your opponent was perhaps too frustrated that he was unable to exploit the pins, his position looked very promising at move 9.
@OP: I don't think allowing 7. ... Bxf3 8. exf3 (allowing those doubled Pawns on the f-file you mentioned) would have been so bad. If you would have captured toward the center by 8. gxf3, then your Kingside would definitely have been exposed, and castling to that side would not look very good at all. However, after 8. exf3, your King would be covered just fine after castling. Your opponent would be ill-advised to make this capture (7. ... Bxf3), because he would encourage your position to gain scope and mobility, after your light-square Bishop's path would be opened.
By the way I meant to write 'premature resignation' no idea why i typed draw.
A piece is a very large advantage. When I play CM9000's engine taking knight odds in 10|0 I have to play well, but I can outplay it, at least until I get into time pressure. I would guess that a knight is worth at least 1000 points ELO. At beginner level it is probably worth much less though, and as your opponent was higher rated than you by quite a bit I would have played on in his position.
After you capture his knight you will also have a positional advantage more than just your extra piece.
I'm missing something - doesnt 14. ... Bxb4 make it interesting at least?
It would go something like this... 14. b4 Bxb4 15. Bb2 Ne2+ 16. Bxe2 Bxd2 17. Rfd1 Bxe3 and you have at least two pawns for the piece.
14...Bxb4 15.Nb3, or am I missing something?
(EDIT) No twas I missing something 14. ... Bxb4 is a boo boo after 15. Nb3 or even 15. Nxc4.
HTML and JS
by mauve_penguin a few minutes ago
why d4 is better than e4
by kleelof 3 minutes ago
12/24/2014 - Let's Do It Again, Mate in 3
by Vicentin084 3 minutes ago
Beware! Low stats does not equal lack of ability!
by Robert0905 5 minutes ago
by Robert0905 7 minutes ago
Colorado-Counter Gambit with either 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 f5 or 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nf3 f5
by lolurspammed 9 minutes ago
Isn't disabling premove cheating?
by skakmadurinn 9 minutes ago
Minimum no. of moves for a stalemate in chess?
by phreshnez 9 minutes ago
ღ OFFICIAL 2014 Chess.com Awards ღ
by Syd_Arthur 10 minutes ago
Help! Is Knight + f + h pawn vs Bishop a draw?
by Equiv 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!